Iancu Aida, Tudor Raluca, Chita Dana Simona, Juratu Catalin, Tudor Anca, Buleu Florina, Popa Daian, Brad Silviu
Department of Radiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, E. Murgu Square no. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
County Emergency Clinical Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", 300732 Timisoara, Romania.
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 18;14(2):216. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020216.
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) via the transbrachial approach (TBA) is a very rare option used in cases of patients with aortic pathologies and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to the insufficient evidence in the literature, the difficulty from a technical point of view and the result of this technique influenced by the complications that frequently accompany it.
Only a few cases of patients with aortic pathologies and acute ischemic stroke where MT via TBA were reported in the literature, and its application in the emergency management of AIS has still not been dealt with in detail.
Out of a need to clarify and clearly emphasize the effectiveness of this approach in emergency MT via TBA in patients with AIS and aortic pathologies, this literature review and case report has the following objectives: the first one is the presentation of an emergency MT via transbrachial approach performed in a 44-year-old patient with AIS and diagnosed aortic coarctation during transfemural approach (TFA), with successful reperfusion in our department and the second one is to review the cases reports of patients with different aortic pathologies and AIS reperfusion therapy performed by MT via TBA from the literature.
A total of nine cases (one personal case and eight published cases) were revised in terms of aortic pathologies type, reperfusion therapy type, and the complication of both mechanical thrombectomy and local transbrachial approach.
Mechanical thrombectomy through the transbrachial approach was the first choice in more than half of these cases (55.55%, n = 5 cases) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the presence of previously diagnosed aortic pathologies. In one-third of all cases (33.33%, n = 3, our case and 2 case reports from the literature), the transbrachial approach was chosen after attempting to advance the guiding catheter through the transfemoral approach and intraprocedural diagnosis of aortic pathology. In only one case, after an ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery that showed a monophasic flow, MT was performed via TBA. Local transbrachial complication was reported in one case, and in two other cases, it was not stated if there were such complications. Hemorrhagic transformation of AIS was reported in two cases that underwent MT-only cerebral reperfusion via TBA, one with acute aortic dissection type A and our case of previously undiagnosed aortic coarctation. In the cases in whom short and long-term follow-up was reported, the outcome of treatment, which was not exclusively endovascular (77.77% cases with only MT and 33.33% with association of first thrombolysis and after MT), was good (six from nine patients). In two case reports, the outcomes were not stated, and one patient died after a long hospitalization in the intensive care unit from respiratory complications (our patient).
Being a clinical emergency, acute ischemic stroke requires urgent medical intervention. In patients with aortic pathologies, where acute ischemic stroke emergency care is a challenge, mechanical thrombectomy via the transbrachial approach is a safe alternative method for cerebral reperfusion.
经肱动脉途径(TBA)进行机械取栓术(MT)是一种非常罕见的选择,用于患有主动脉病变和急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的患者,原因在于文献证据不足、技术操作困难以及该技术的结果受其常见并发症的影响。
文献中仅报道了少数患有主动脉病变和急性缺血性卒中且采用经肱动脉途径进行机械取栓术的病例,其在急性缺血性卒中急诊治疗中的应用仍未得到详细探讨。
出于明确并清晰强调该方法在急性缺血性卒中和主动脉病变患者经肱动脉途径急诊机械取栓术中有效性的需求,本综述和病例报告具有以下目的:第一个目的是介绍在一名44岁急性缺血性卒中患者中进行的经肱动脉途径急诊机械取栓术,该患者在经股动脉途径(TFA)时被诊断为主动脉缩窄,在我们科室成功实现再灌注;第二个目的是回顾文献中不同主动脉病变和急性缺血性卒中患者经肱动脉途径进行机械取栓术再灌注治疗的病例报告。
共对9例病例(1例个人病例和8例已发表病例)在主动脉病变类型、再灌注治疗类型以及机械取栓术和局部肱动脉途径并发症方面进行了分析。
在超过一半的病例(55.55%,n = 5例)中,经肱动脉途径进行机械取栓术是治疗先前诊断为主动脉病变的急性缺血性卒中的首选方法。在所有病例的三分之一(33.33%,n = 3例,我们的病例以及文献中的2例病例报告)中,在尝试经股动脉途径推进引导导管并在术中诊断出主动脉病变后选择了经肱动脉途径。仅在1例病例中,经桡动脉超声评估显示为单相血流后,通过经肱动脉途径进行了机械取栓术。1例报告了局部肱动脉并发症,另外2例未提及是否存在此类并发症。2例仅通过经肱动脉途径进行机械取栓术实现脑再灌注的病例报告了急性缺血性卒中的出血转化,1例为急性A型主动脉夹层,我们的病例为先前未诊断出的主动脉缩窄。在报告了短期和长期随访的病例中,治疗结果良好(9例患者中有6例),治疗结果并非仅为血管内治疗(77.77%的病例仅进行了机械取栓术,33.33%的病例先进行了溶栓然后进行机械取栓术)。在2例病例报告中未提及结果,1例患者在重症监护病房长期住院后因呼吸并发症死亡(我们的患者)。
作为临床急症,急性缺血性卒中需要紧急医疗干预。在患有主动脉病变的患者中,急性缺血性卒中的急诊治疗具有挑战性,经肱动脉途径进行机械取栓术是一种安全的脑再灌注替代方法。