Suppr超能文献

消融治疗背景下肾肿瘤活检的当代结果和临床实用性:单中心经验。

Contemporary Results and Clinical Utility of Renal Mass Biopsies in the Setting of Ablative Therapy: A single center experience.

机构信息

Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

出版信息

Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;25:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100209. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical guidelines have recently included renal mass biopsy (RMB) in management algorithms, especially in the setting of small renal masses ≤ 4 cm (SRM) and ablative therapy. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic rates of RMB, factors associated with a non-diagnostic biopsy, its clinical utility, and its safety profile in the setting of ablative therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 174 RMB from 167 patients, performed in a tertiary academic center from 01/2015 to 01/2019, were included. Patient demographics, radiographic mass size, RMB diagnoses, subsequent clinical management, and complications were retrospectively reviewed. RMBs were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic based on set criteria.

RESULTS

The mean mass size was 3.0 cm (range: 0.5-15.3 cm) and 140 biopsies (80%) were SRM. Among all RMB, 159 (91%) were diagnostic and 15 (9%) were non-diagnostic. Non-diagnostic biopsies were associated with small mass size, the presence of a cystic component (p < 0.00001) and fewer number of cores submitted (p = 0.0046). All non-diagnostic biopsies occurred in SRMs, where the mean mass size was significantly smaller than diagnostic biopsies (1.3 versus 3.2 cm, p = 0.001). RMB with concurrent ablation yielded non-diagnostic results more frequently than isolated RMBs (15% vs 2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RMB is useful for definitive diagnosis and clinical management in the setting of ablative therapy. Small mass size, cystic lesions, and fewer number of passes obtained are associated with non-diagnostic biopsies. When a renal mass diagnosis is particularly critical, a separate biopsy procedure prior to ablative therapy is recommended.

摘要

目的

最近的临床指南将肾肿瘤活检(RMB)纳入了治疗方案,特别是在小肾肿瘤(SRM)≤4cm 和消融治疗的情况下。我们旨在评估 RMB 的诊断率、与非诊断性活检相关的因素、其在消融治疗中的临床应用及其安全性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月在一家三级学术中心进行的 167 例患者的 174 例 RMB。患者的人口统计学资料、影像学肿块大小、RMB 诊断、后续临床管理和并发症均进行了回顾性分析。根据设定的标准,将 RMB 分为诊断性或非诊断性。

结果

平均肿块大小为 3.0cm(范围:0.5-15.3cm),140 例活检(80%)为 SRM。所有 RMB 中,159 例(91%)为诊断性,15 例(9%)为非诊断性。非诊断性活检与肿块小、存在囊性成分(p<0.00001)和提交的核心数量较少(p=0.0046)有关。所有非诊断性活检均发生在 SRM 中,其平均肿块大小明显小于诊断性活检(1.3cm 与 3.2cm,p=0.001)。同时进行消融治疗的 RMB 比单独进行 RMB 的非诊断性结果更常见(分别为 15%和 2%)。

结论

在消融治疗的情况下,RMB 对明确诊断和临床管理是有用的。肿块小、囊性病变和获取的核心数量少与非诊断性活检相关。当肾肿瘤的诊断特别关键时,建议在消融治疗前单独进行活检。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验