Department of Urology and University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
J Endourol. 2022 May;36(5):703-711. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0664.
We evaluated our experience of a multidisciplinary approach to renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs) employing in-office ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy by urology (24%), CT, or US biopsy by interventional radiology (IR) (79%), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy by gastroenterology (GI) (4%). A single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent RMB for SRM from May 2013 to August 2019 was conducted. Data regarding patient demographics, tumor characteristics, biopsy technique, histopathology, and management were collected. Diagnostic rates, concordance with final pathology, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Of the 192 biopsies reviewed, 63% biopsies were malignant, 20% were benign, and 17% were nondiagnostic. Based on biopsy results, 71 patients (37%) elected active surveillance. Thirty-eight (20%) patients underwent cryoablation, 56 (29%) underwent partial nephrectomy, 14 (7%) underwent radical nephrectomy, and the remaining patients were treated elsewhere. The rate of surgery for benign pathology after pretreatment RMB was 3%. The concordance rate between biopsy and final pathology was 99% for malignancy, 96% for specific pathology subtype, and 85% for renal cell carcinoma grade. Median time from diagnosis to definitive treatment was 97 days (urology: 76, IR: 110 and GI: 54, = 0.002). Three (1.6%) Clavien I complications were reported. Our multidisciplinary approach to RMB for clinical stage T1a demonstrated favorable safety and diagnostic rates, which effectively directed management strategies and minimized surgery for benign disease. Urologist-performed office biopsies significantly shortened the time from diagnosis to definitive treatment. Our experience with GI EUS biopsy has demonstrated feasibility and safety for tumors that were otherwise not accessible percutaneously.
我们评估了多学科方法在小肾肿块 (SRM) 肾肿块活检 (RMB) 中的应用经验,采用泌尿科医生进行的局麻超声 (US) 引导活检 (24%)、CT 或介入放射学 (IR) 引导的 US 活检 (79%)、以及胃肠病学 (GI) 进行的内镜超声 (EUS) 引导活检 (4%)。对 2013 年 5 月至 2019 年 8 月期间因 SRM 而行 RMB 的患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。收集了患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、活检技术、组织病理学和管理方面的数据。分析了诊断率、与最终病理的一致性、并发症和结果。在审查的 192 例活检中,63%的活检为恶性,20%为良性,17%为非诊断性。根据活检结果,71 例患者 (37%)选择了主动监测。38 例 (20%)患者接受冷冻消融治疗,56 例 (29%)接受部分肾切除术,14 例 (7%)接受根治性肾切除术,其余患者在其他地方接受治疗。预处理 RMB 后良性病理手术率为 3%。活检与最终病理的一致性在恶性肿瘤方面为 99%,在特定病理亚型方面为 96%,在肾细胞癌分级方面为 85%。从诊断到明确治疗的中位时间为 97 天 (泌尿科医生:76 天,IR:110 天,GI:54 天, = 0.002)。报告了 3 例 (1.6%)Clavien I 级并发症。我们对 T1a 期临床分期的 RMB 采用多学科方法,显示出良好的安全性和诊断率,有效指导了管理策略,并最大限度地减少了良性疾病的手术。泌尿科医生进行的局麻活检显著缩短了从诊断到明确治疗的时间。我们在 GI EUS 活检方面的经验表明,对于经皮无法到达的肿瘤,该方法是可行和安全的。