Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jan;154:179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
To investigate the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for early breast cancer compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in a prospective and randomized trial.
From March 2015 to February 2018, 693 patients with pT1-2N0M0 early breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned into IMRT and 3D-CRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). The secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, overall survival, acute toxicity, target coverage index, irradiation dose to organs at risk, and fatigue inventory. The radiation dose for the 3D-CRT arm was 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions for 6.5 weeks. It was 57.4 Gy in 28 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost for 5.5 weeks for the IMRT arm.
Of 693 patients, 349 and 344 patients received 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRRFS between the two arms. Conformity index of planning target volume was significantly superior in the IMRT arm than the 3D-CRT arm (p < 0.001). The mean lung dose and V-V for the ipsilateral lung were significantly lower in the IMRT arm than the 3D-CRT arm (all p < 0.05). The incidence of grade 2 or higher dermatitis was significantly lower in the IMRT arm (p = 0.009).
Compared to 3D-CRT, IMRT showed similar results in locoregional tumor control but superior results in planning target volume coverage. When IMRT is used in breast cancer, the irradiation dose to an ipsilateral lung and skin toxicity can be reduced.
在一项前瞻性、随机试验中,研究与三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)相比,调强放疗(IMRT)治疗早期乳腺癌的安全性和疗效。
2015 年 3 月至 2018 年 2 月,共纳入 693 例接受保乳手术的 pT1-2N0M0 期早期乳腺癌患者,并随机分为 IMRT 和 3D-CRT 组。主要终点是 3 年局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)。次要终点是无复发生存率、总生存率、急性毒性、靶区覆盖指数、危及器官照射剂量和疲劳量表。3D-CRT 组的放疗剂量为 59.4Gy,分 33 次,6.5 周完成;IMRT 组为 57.4Gy,分 28 次,5.5 周完成同步整合增敏。
693 例患者中,349 例和 344 例分别接受 3D-CRT 和 IMRT 治疗。两组 LRRFS 无显著差异。IMRT 组计划靶区的适形指数明显优于 3D-CRT 组(p<0.001)。IMRT 组的平均肺剂量和同侧肺 V-V 明显低于 3D-CRT 组(均 p<0.05)。IMRT 组 2 级或以上皮炎的发生率明显低于 3D-CRT 组(p=0.009)。
与 3D-CRT 相比,IMRT 在局部肿瘤控制方面的结果相似,但在靶区覆盖方面的结果更好。在乳腺癌中使用 IMRT 时,可以降低同侧肺和皮肤毒性的照射剂量。