ARTHRO Medics, Shoulder and Elbow Center, Thannerstrasse 45, 4054, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2325-2332. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
To develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability.
A consensus process following the modified Delphi technique was conducted. Panel members were selected among the European Shoulder Associates of ESSKA. Five rounds were performed between October 2018 and November 2019. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into blocks referring to imaging, classifications, surgical approach for acute and chronic cases, conservative treatment. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of an online questionnaire. Consensus was achieved when ≥ 66.7% of the participants agreed on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data.
A consensus was reached on the following topics. Imaging: a true anteroposterior or a bilateral Zanca view are sufficient for diagnosis. 93% of the panel agreed on clinical override testing during body cross test to identify horizontal instability. The Rockwood classification, as modified by the ISAKOS statement, was deemed valid. The separation line between acute and chronic cases was set at 3 weeks. The panel agreed on arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction using a suspensory device (86.2%), with no need of a biological augmentation (82.8%) in acute injuries, whereas biological reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with tendon graft was suggested in chronic cases. Conservative approach and postoperative care were found similar CONCLUSION: A consensus was found on the main topics of controversy in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Each step of the diagnostic treatment algorithm was fully investigated and clarified.
Level V.
就肩锁关节不稳定的诊断和治疗达成共识。
采用改良 Delphi 技术进行共识过程。小组成员选自 ESSKA 的欧洲肩部协会。2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 11 月进行了五轮。第一轮包括收集问题,然后将问题分为影像学、分类、急性和慢性病例的手术入路、保守治疗等块。随后几轮通过在线问卷进行总结。当≥66.7%的参与者对一个答案达成一致时,就达成了共识。使用描述性统计来总结数据。
就以下主题达成共识。影像学:真正的前后位或双侧 Zanca 位足以诊断。93%的小组同意在体交叉试验中进行临床覆盖测试,以识别水平不稳定。ISAKOS 声明修改后的 Rockwood 分类被认为是有效的。将急性和慢性病例的分界线设定为 3 周。小组同意使用悬带装置进行关节镜辅助解剖重建(86.2%),急性损伤无需生物增强(82.8%),而慢性病例建议使用肌腱移植物进行喙锁和肩锁韧带的生物重建。保守治疗和术后护理被认为是相似的。
在肩锁关节脱位治疗的主要争议点上达成了共识。对诊断治疗算法的每一步都进行了充分的调查和澄清。
5 级。