Suppr超能文献

三型肩锁关节脱位的治疗:印度肩肘学会(SESI)的德尔菲共识调查。

Management of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A Delphi consensus survey by Shoulder & Elbow Society, India (SESI).

机构信息

Sportsmed, Mumbai, Opp. Motilal Oswal Towers, Parel, Mumbai, India.

Sir H.N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Prarthana Samaj, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Rd, Girgaon, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Jun;55 Suppl 2:111467. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111467. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to report the results of the Delphi survey conducted by the Shoulder, Elbow Society India (SESI), to achieve consensus on ambiguous topics in managing type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations.

METHODS

This study was based on responses from the Shoulder Elbow Society India (SESI) panel of peer-selected twenty senior surgeons practicing shoulder orthopedics. They participated in two rounds of the survey to obtain consensus on several topics pertaining to the management of type III ACJ dislocations. Consensus was achieved when at least 70 % of the panel members selected at least a 4-point on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Our Delphi survey reached a consensus on seven topics of ambiguity. An anteroposterior and axillary view of the shoulder without any traction or weight in hand is sufficient in the setting of a suspected type III ACJ dislocation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely indicated in type III ACJ dislocation. Either cross-arm adduction X-rays or clinical examination may be used to distinguish between ISAKOS (International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee surgery and Orthopaedics Sports medicine) IIIA and B classification of ACJ to identify stable and unstable injuries. Conservative treatment can be offered to patients who have stable injuries and who are not high-demand individuals in acute type III ACJ dislocations. In conservative management of type III ACJ dislocation, a two-week sling suffices. Jones strapping has no clear advantage over a shoulder sling. Coracoclavicular reconstruction with an autograft is an acceptable way to treat symptomatic, chronic grade III ACJ dislocation.

CONCLUSION

The survey helped achieve consensus on several controversial issues related to type III ACJ dislocations. However, there remains ambiguity on the definition of chronicity of such dislocations, the necessity of bilateral Zanca views, and the duration of conservative trial before switching to a surgical line of management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告由印度肩肘学会(SESI)进行的 Delphi 调查结果,旨在就 III 型肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位治疗中存在的模糊问题达成共识。

方法

本研究基于印度肩肘学会(SESI)的一组 20 名高级肩部骨科医生的同行选择的专家小组的回复。他们参加了两轮调查,就与 III 型 ACJ 脱位管理相关的几个主题达成共识。当至少 70%的小组成员在 5 分制的 Likert 量表上选择至少 4 分时,就达成了共识。

结果

我们的 Delphi 调查就七个存在歧义的问题达成了共识。在疑似 III 型 ACJ 脱位的情况下,无手持重物的前后位和腋位 X 线片足以满足要求。III 型 ACJ 脱位不常规行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。无论是交叉臂内收 X 线片还是临床检查,都可用于区分 ISAKOS(国际关节镜、膝关节外科和矫形运动医学协会)ACJ 的 3A 和 3B 分类,以识别稳定和不稳定的损伤。对于急性 III 型 ACJ 脱位中稳定损伤且非高需求的患者,可以提供保守治疗。在 III 型 ACJ 脱位的保守治疗中,两周吊带就足够了。Jones 固定带没有优于肩吊带的明显优势。自体移植物的喙锁重建是治疗有症状的慢性 III 级 ACJ 脱位的一种可接受方法。

结论

该调查有助于就 III 型 ACJ 脱位相关的几个有争议的问题达成共识。然而,对于这些脱位的慢性定义、双侧 Zanca 位的必要性以及在转为手术治疗前保守治疗的持续时间,仍存在歧义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验