Suppr超能文献

评估加纳引入卫生技术评估的能力:加纳进行的经济评估的系统评价。

Assessing the capacity of Ghana to introduce health technology assessment: a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted in Ghana.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Oct;36(5):500-507. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000689. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ghana is in the process of formally introducing health technology assessment (HTA) for health decision making. Similar to other low- and middle-income countries, evidence suggests that the lack of data and human capacity is a major barrier to the conduct and use of HTA. This study assessed the current human and data capacity available in Ghana to undertake HTA.

METHODS

As economic evaluation (EE) forms an integral part of HTA, a systematic review of EE studies undertaken in Ghana was conducted to identify the quality and number of studies available, methods and source of data used, and local persons involved. The literature search was undertaken in EMBASE (including MEDLINE), PUBMED, and Google Scholar. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards. The number of local Ghanaians who contributed to authorship were used as a proxy for assessing human capacity for HTA.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included in the final review. Overall, studies were of good quality. Studies derived their effectiveness, resource utilization and cost data mainly from Ghana. The most common source of cost data was from the National Health Insurance Scheme pricing list for medicines and tariffs. Effectiveness data were mostly derived from either single study or intervention programs. Sixty out of 199 authors were Ghanaians (30 percent); these authors were mostly involved in data collection and study conceptualization.

CONCLUSIONS

Human capacity for HTA in Ghana is limited. To introduce HTA successfully in Ghana, policy makers would need to develop more local capacity to undertake Ghanaian-specific HTA.

摘要

目的

加纳正处于将卫生技术评估(HTA)正式引入卫生决策的过程中。与其他中低收入国家类似,有证据表明,缺乏数据和人力是进行和使用 HTA 的主要障碍。本研究评估了加纳目前进行 HTA 所具备的人力和数据能力。

方法

由于经济评价(EE)是 HTA 的一个组成部分,因此对加纳开展的 EE 研究进行了系统评价,以确定现有研究的质量和数量、使用的方法和数据来源,以及参与的当地人员。文献检索在 EMBASE(包括 MEDLINE)、PUBMED 和 Google Scholar 中进行。使用统一的健康经济学评估报告标准评估研究的质量。当地加纳人参与作者的人数被用作评估 HTA 人力的代理指标。

结果

最终综述纳入了 31 项研究。总体而言,这些研究的质量较高。研究的有效性、资源利用和成本数据主要来自加纳。成本数据最常见的来源是国家健康保险计划的药品定价清单和关税。有效性数据主要来自单一研究或干预计划。199 位作者中有 60 位是加纳人(30%);这些作者主要参与数据收集和研究概念化。

结论

加纳进行 HTA 的人力有限。为了在加纳成功引入 HTA,政策制定者需要发展更多的本地能力,以进行针对加纳的特定 HTA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验