Lutes Christopher C, Holton Chase W, Truesdale Robert, Zimmerman John H, Schumacher Brian
Jacobs, 9304 Coachway, Chapel Hill NC, 27516.
RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Durham, NC 27709.
Ground Water Monit Remediat. 2019 Feb 28;39(1):66-72. doi: 10.1111/gwmr.12310.
Building pressure cycling (BPC) is becoming an increasingly important tool for studying vapor intrusion. BPC has been used to distinguish subslab and indoor sources of vapor intrusion as well as to define reasonable worst case volatile organic compound mass discharge into a structure. Analyses have been performed both semi-quantitatively with concentration trends and quantitatively with more rigorous flux calculation and source attribution methods. This paper reviews and compares the protocols and outcomes from multiple published applications of this technology to define the key variables that control performance. Common lessons learned are identified, including those that help define the range of building size and type to which BPC is applicable. Differences in test protocols are discussed, recognizing that the complexity of the test protocol required depends on the particular objectives of each project. Research gaps are identified and tabulated for future validation studies and applications.
建筑物压力循环(BPC)正日益成为研究蒸汽侵入的重要工具。BPC已被用于区分蒸汽侵入的楼板下和室内来源,以及确定挥发性有机化合物向建筑物内合理的最坏情况质量排放。分析既采用了基于浓度趋势的半定量方法,也采用了更严格的通量计算和源归因方法进行定量分析。本文回顾并比较了该技术多个已发表应用的方案和结果,以确定控制性能的关键变量。总结了常见的经验教训,包括有助于确定BPC适用的建筑物尺寸和类型范围的经验教训。讨论了测试方案的差异,认识到所需测试方案的复杂性取决于每个项目的特定目标。确定并列出了研究差距,以供未来的验证研究和应用参考。