• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圣乔治呼吸问卷是否适合作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床试验中症状严重程度和活动受限的衡量指标?对五项随机临床试验汇总数据的分析。

Is the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire an Appropriate Measure of Symptom Severity and Activity Limitations for Clinical Trials in COPD? Analysis of Pooled Data from Five Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Loubert Angely, Regnault Antoine, Meunier Juliette, Gutzwiller Florian S, Regnier Stéphane A

机构信息

Modus Outcomes, Lyon, France.

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Sep 8;15:2103-2113. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S261919. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S261919
PMID:32982203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7490086/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RMT analysis was conducted on the baseline SGRQ data from five multi-national, Phase III randomized trials investigating a fixed-dose combination of a long-acting β2-agonist and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist in COPD patients. Analysis was performed for the SGRQ "Symptoms" and "Activity" domains. An exploratory analysis was also conducted using the different specific symptoms as defined in the reconceptualization of the SGRQ "Symptoms" domain. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was performed for geographical regions on the "Activity" domain, in order to explore cross-cultural validity of the SGRQ.

RESULTS

Overall, the SGRQ "Activity" domain showed good measurement property, but two items ("Sitting or lying still making feel breathless" and "Playing sports or game making feel breathless") showed very high fit residuals. The SGRQ "Symptoms" domain demonstrated good targeting; however, two items showed disordered thresholds ("Coughed" and "Brought up phlegm"). In an exploratory RMT analysis, measures for "Cough and Sputum", "Breathing difficulties" or "Wheezing attacks" showed unsatisfactory measurement properties with poor reliability (person separation index = 0.35, 0.66 and 0.16, respectively) and targeting issues. The examination of cross-cultural performances of the SGRQ "Activity" items showed a great variability in the responses to these items in different global regions.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that SGRQ may not be an appropriate instrument to measure symptom severity or activity limitations in patients with COPD. Hence, there is a need to develop other relevant PRO instruments that can be used in conjunction with SGRQ to provide a holistic assessment of the health status of COPD patients in clinical research.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是使用拉施测量理论(RMT)分析来检验圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

对五项多国III期随机试验的基线SGRQ数据进行RMT分析,这些试验研究了长效β2受体激动剂和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂的固定剂量组合在COPD患者中的应用。对SGRQ的“症状”和“活动”领域进行了分析。还使用SGRQ“症状”领域重新概念化中定义的不同特定症状进行了探索性分析。对“活动”领域的地理区域进行了差异项目功能(DIF)分析,以探索SGRQ的跨文化有效性。

结果

总体而言,SGRQ“活动”领域显示出良好的测量特性,但有两个项目(“坐着或躺着不动会感到呼吸困难”和“进行体育活动或游戏会感到呼吸困难”)显示出非常高的拟合残差。SGRQ“症状”领域显示出良好的针对性;然而,有两个项目显示出阈值紊乱(“咳嗽”和“咳痰”)。在探索性RMT分析中,“咳嗽和咳痰”、“呼吸困难”或“喘息发作”的测量指标显示出不令人满意的测量特性,可靠性较差(个人分离指数分别为0.35、0.66和0.16)以及针对性问题。对SGRQ“活动”项目的跨文化表现检查显示,不同全球区域对这些项目的反应存在很大差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,SGRQ可能不是测量COPD患者症状严重程度或活动受限的合适工具。因此,需要开发其他相关的患者报告结局(PRO)工具,可与SGRQ结合使用,以在临床研究中对COPD患者的健康状况进行全面评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/12c43f6e8aca/COPD-15-2103-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/c508b16c880b/COPD-15-2103-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/254a7d1e0190/COPD-15-2103-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/3b90159f6b8e/COPD-15-2103-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/cdfd9e28fda0/COPD-15-2103-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/b8c21f7efb9a/COPD-15-2103-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/12c43f6e8aca/COPD-15-2103-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/c508b16c880b/COPD-15-2103-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/254a7d1e0190/COPD-15-2103-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/3b90159f6b8e/COPD-15-2103-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/cdfd9e28fda0/COPD-15-2103-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/b8c21f7efb9a/COPD-15-2103-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a304/7490086/12c43f6e8aca/COPD-15-2103-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire an Appropriate Measure of Symptom Severity and Activity Limitations for Clinical Trials in COPD? Analysis of Pooled Data from Five Randomized Clinical Trials.圣乔治呼吸问卷是否适合作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床试验中症状严重程度和活动受限的衡量指标?对五项随机临床试验汇总数据的分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Sep 8;15:2103-2113. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S261919. eCollection 2020.
2
A psychometric assessment of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire in patients with COPD using Rasch model analysis.使用拉施模型分析对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行圣乔治呼吸问卷的心理测量评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 20;13:131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0320-7.
3
French-Canadian version of the Chronic Respiratory and St George's Respiratory questionnaires: an assessment of their psychometric properties in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性呼吸系统问卷和圣乔治呼吸问卷的法裔加拿大人版本:对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者其心理测量特性的评估
Can Respir J. 2004 Oct;11(7):480-6. doi: 10.1155/2004/702421.
4
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.每日一次长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂联合吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病对比安慰剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 6;3(3):CD012930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012930.pub2.
5
Validation and clinical interpretation of the St George's respiratory questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-C) after adaptation to Malaysian language and culture, in patients with COPD.验证和临床解读经过马来西亚语言和文化适应性调整后的慢性阻塞性肺疾病圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ-C)在 COPD 患者中的应用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 13;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01393-1.
6
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
7
Health status in COPD cannot be measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire alone: an evaluation of the underlying concepts of this questionnaire.COPD 患者的健康状况不能仅通过圣乔治呼吸问卷进行衡量:对该问卷基本概念的评估。
Respir Res. 2010 Jul 22;11(1):98. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-98.
8
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument.慢性阻塞性肺疾病夜间症状量表的心理测量学特性评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Mar 6;10:475-87. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S75776. eCollection 2015.
9
Long-term health-related quality-of-life and symptom response profiles with arformoterol in COPD: results from a 52-week trial.阿福特罗用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长期健康相关生活质量和症状反应情况:一项52周试验的结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 5;13:499-508. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S141729. eCollection 2018.
10
A meta-analysis of four randomized clinical trials to confirm the reliability and responsiveness of the Shortness of Breath with Daily Activities (SOBDA) questionnaire in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一项对四项随机临床试验的荟萃分析,以证实日常活动气短(SOBDA)问卷在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的可靠性和反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 31;13:177. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0369-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It Time Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Had a Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure? A Review.α-1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症是否到了拥有特定患者报告结局指标的时候?一项综述。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2025 Jan 15;16:23-35. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S490849. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender-specific estimates of COPD prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率的性别特异性估计:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 May 10;13:1507-1514. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S146390. eCollection 2018.
2
Understanding the impact of symptoms on the burden of COPD.了解症状对慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担的影响。
Respir Res. 2017 Apr 21;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0548-3.
3
Efficacy and safety of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in Japanese patients with COPD: a subgroup analysis from the SHINE study.
茚达特罗/格隆溴铵在日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:来自SHINE研究的亚组分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Oct 11;11:2543-2551. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S111408. eCollection 2016.
4
Patient reported outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Which to use?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告的结局指标:该选用哪些?
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(3):351-62. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2016.1146595. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
A psychometric assessment of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire in patients with COPD using Rasch model analysis.使用拉施模型分析对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行圣乔治呼吸问卷的心理测量评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 20;13:131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0320-7.
6
FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and Safety of QVA149 (Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate) versus Its Monocomponents and Placebo in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.FLIGHT1 和 FLIGHT2 研究:茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(QVA149)对比其单药成分和安慰剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1068-79. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1048OC.
7
LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD.灯笼研究:一项关于QVA149与沙美特罗/氟替卡松联合用药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 5;10:1015-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S84436. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessing patient reported outcome measures: A practical guide for gastroenterologists.评估患者报告的结局指标:胃肠病学家实用指南。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Dec;2(6):463-70. doi: 10.1177/2050640614558345.
9
Pooling of cross-cultural PRO data in multinational clinical trials: how much can poor measurement affect statistical power?跨国临床试验中跨文化患者报告结局(PRO)数据的合并:测量不佳会对统计效力产生多大影响?
Qual Life Res. 2015 Feb;24(2):273-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0765-x. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations with the dual bronchodilator QVA149 compared with glycopyrronium and tiotropium (SPARK): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.与格隆溴铵和噻托溴铵相比,双支气管扩张剂 QVA149 治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的分析(SPARK):一项随机、双盲、平行分组研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70052-3. Epub 2013 Apr 23.