Hollville Enzo, Rabita Giuseppe, Guilhem Gaël, Lecompte Jennyfer, Nordez Antoine
French Institute of Sport (INSEP), Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), Paris, France.
NG Lab, Natural Grass, Paris, France.
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 31;11:917. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00917. eCollection 2020.
Interactions between human movement and surfaces have previously been studied to understand the influence of surface properties on the mechanics and energetics of jumping. However, little is known about the muscle-tendon unit (MTU) mechanics associated with muscle activity and leg adjustments induced by different surfaces during this movement. This study aimed to examine the effects of three surfaces with different properties (artificial turf, hybrid turf, and athletic track) on the muscle mechanics and muscle excitation of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and vastus lateralis (VL) during maximal countermovement jumping (CMJ). Twelve participants performed maximal CMJs on the three sport surfaces. GM and VL muscle fascicles were simultaneously imaged using two ultrafast ultrasound systems (500 Hz). MTUs lengths were determined based on anthropometric models and two-dimensional joint kinematics. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record GM and VL muscle activity. Surface mechanical testing revealed systematic differences in surface mechanical properties ( = 0.006, η: 0.26-0.32, ). Specifically, the highest force reduction and vertical deformation values have been observed on artificial turf (65 ± 2% and 9.0 ± 0.3 mm, respectively), while athletic track exhibited the lowest force reduction and vertical deformation values (28 ± 1% and 2.1 ± 0.1 mm, respectively) and the highest energy restitution (65 ± 1%). We observed no significant difference in CMJ performance between the three surfaces (∼35-36 cm, = 0.66). GM and VL fascicle shortening ( = 0.90 and = 0.94, respectively) and shortening velocity ( = 0.13 and = 0.65, respectively) were also unaffected by the type of surface. However, when jumping from greater deformable surface, both GM muscle activity ( = 0.022, η = 0.18, ) and peak shortening velocity of GM MTU ( = 0.042, η = 0.10, ) increased during the push-off phase. This resulted in a greater peak plantar flexion velocity late in the jump ( = 0.027, η = 0.13, ). Our findings suggest that maximal vertical jumping tasks in humans is not affected by common sport surfaces with different mechanical properties. However, internal regulatory mechanisms exist to compensate for differences in surface properties.
此前,人们对人体运动与地面之间的相互作用进行了研究,以了解地面特性对跳跃力学和能量学的影响。然而,对于在此运动过程中,不同地面引起的肌肉活动和腿部调整所涉及的肌腱单元(MTU)力学,我们却知之甚少。本研究旨在考察三种不同特性地面(人造草皮、混合草皮和田径跑道)对最大反向纵跳(CMJ)过程中腓肠肌内侧头(GM)和股外侧肌(VL)的肌肉力学及肌肉兴奋的影响。12名参与者在这三种运动地面上进行了最大CMJ测试。使用两个超快超声系统(500Hz)同时对GM和VL肌束进行成像。基于人体测量模型和二维关节运动学确定MTU长度。采用表面肌电图(EMG)记录GM和VL的肌肉活动。表面力学测试揭示了地面力学特性的系统性差异(=0.006,η:0.26 - 0.32,)。具体而言,在人造草皮上观察到最高的力降低值和垂直变形值(分别为65±2%和9.0±0.3mm),而田径跑道的力降低值和垂直变形值最低(分别为28±1%和2.1±0.1mm),且能量恢复最高(65±1%)。我们观察到三种地面之间的CMJ表现无显著差异(约35 - 36cm,=0.66)。GM和VL肌束缩短(分别为=0.90和=0.94)以及缩短速度(分别为=0.13和=0.65)也不受地面类型的影响。然而,当从变形更大的地面起跳时,在蹬地阶段,GM肌肉活动(=0.022,η = 0.18,)和GM MTU的峰值缩短速度(=0.042,η = 0.10,)均增加。这导致跳跃后期的峰值跖屈速度更大(=0.027,η = 0.13,)。我们的研究结果表明,人类最大垂直跳跃任务不受具有不同力学特性的常见运动地面的影响。然而,存在内部调节机制来补偿地面特性的差异。