Furnham Adrian, Horne George, Grover Simmy
BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;11:2250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02250. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to examine bright- and dark-side personality, personal beliefs (religion and politics) and self-evaluation correlates of beliefs in the Militant Extremist Mindset (MEM). In all, 506 young adults completed various self-report measures in addition to the three-dimensional MEM questionnaire. The measures included short measures of the Big Five traits, Self-Monitoring, Self-Evaluation and Personality Disorders, as well as demographic questions of how religious and politically liberal participants were. The Proviolence, Vile World, and Divine power mindsets showed varying correlates, with no consistent trend. Stepwise regressions showed that the demographic, personality and belief factors accounted for between 14% (Vile World) and 54% (Divine Power) of the variance, There were many differences between the results of three mindset factors, but personality disorder scores remained positive predictors of all three. The Vile World mindset was predicted by religiousness, liberalism, personality disorder scores and negative self-monitoring, but not personality traits. Religiousness had a contribution to all subscales and predicted the vast majority of the Divine Power mindset with smaller relationships with personality and personality disorders. Proviolence was predicted by the majority personality measures and sex.
本研究旨在考察激进极端主义心态(MEM)中的光明面和阴暗面人格、个人信仰(宗教和政治)以及信仰的自我评价相关因素。共有506名年轻人除完成了三维MEM问卷外,还完成了各种自我报告测量。这些测量包括大五人格特质、自我监控、自我评价和人格障碍的简短测量,以及关于参与者宗教和政治自由主义程度的人口统计学问题。亲暴力、邪恶世界和神圣力量心态呈现出不同的相关因素,没有一致的趋势。逐步回归表明,人口统计学、人格和信仰因素占方差的14%(邪恶世界)至54%(神圣力量)。三种心态因素的结果之间存在许多差异,但人格障碍得分仍然是所有三种心态的正向预测因子。邪恶世界心态由宗教信仰、自由主义、人格障碍得分和消极自我监控预测,但不由人格特质预测。宗教信仰对所有子量表都有贡献,并预测了绝大多数的神圣力量心态,与人格和人格障碍的关系较小。亲暴力由大多数人格测量和性别预测。