Conway Janet D
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Jul 24;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00027. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
Knee arthrodesis for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection is a limb salvage procedure that simultaneously provides a stable limb for weight-bearing and effective eradication of the chronic infection. Knee arthrodesis is a final resort for limb salvage that is appropriate for patients with multiple recurrent revisions for infection, a history of failed 2-stage exchanges, medical comorbidities, and an inability to tolerate multiple additional procedures. Another important consideration is whether the patient has a poor soft-tissue envelope that leaves knee arthrodesis as the only viable option. The procedure is a definitive surgery to eliminate return trips to the operating room.
This technique involves knee arthrodesis using a long intramedullary rod inserted proximally through the piriformis fossa that spans the entire medullary canal of the femur and the tibia. Before insertion, the surgeon may elect to create a long antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary rod. The rod is locked proximally and distally. An alternative method for large bone defects (>6 cm) at the level of the knee is to create intercalary antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers.
Alternative surgical treatments for this problem include above-the-knee amputation or resection arthroplasty, neither of which provides a functional limb for weight-bearing. The most common alternative methods for knee arthrodesis include external fixation using circular or biplanar frames, as well as short intramedullary modular rods.
Knee arthrodesis using a long intramedullary rod is a very effective and efficient method of fusion. With recurrent periprosthetic knee infections, metaphyseal bone loss is common and short knee-fusion rods may not provide adequate stability. Long rods for knee arthrodesis use the diaphysis for stability and have the additional advantage of being easily accessible for removal in the event of a recurrent infection with a well-healed fusion. Long intramedullary rods also provide the additional advantages of immediate weight-bearing. Immediate weight-bearing on the affected limb is critical because often these patients have been unable to bear weight preoperatively secondary to pain and infection. External fixation techniques are effective but come with pin-site problems. Pin-site problems are amplified in patients with obesity who have large soft-tissue envelopes, and the long intramedullary rod avoids pin problems in such patients. Antibiotic cement coating of the long intramedullary rod also provides local antibiotic delivery.
膝关节假体周围反复感染的膝关节融合术是一种保肢手术,可同时为负重提供稳定的肢体,并有效根除慢性感染。膝关节融合术是保肢的最终手段,适用于因感染进行多次反复翻修、两阶段翻修失败、有内科合并症且无法耐受多次额外手术的患者。另一个重要考虑因素是患者的软组织包膜是否不佳,致使膝关节融合术成为唯一可行的选择。该手术是一种确定性手术,可避免再次返回手术室。
该技术采用一根长髓内棒进行膝关节融合,髓内棒近端经梨状窝插入,贯穿股骨和胫骨的整个髓腔。在插入之前,外科医生可选择制作一根长的抗生素骨水泥涂层髓内棒。髓内棒在近端和远端锁定。对于膝关节水平的大骨缺损(>6 cm),另一种方法是制作含抗生素的骨水泥间隔物。
针对此问题的替代手术治疗方法包括膝上截肢或切除关节成形术,这两种方法均无法提供用于负重的功能性肢体。膝关节融合术最常见的替代方法包括使用环形或双平面框架进行外固定,以及短髓内模块化棒。
使用长髓内棒进行膝关节融合是一种非常有效且高效的融合方法。对于膝关节假体周围反复感染,干骺端骨质流失很常见,短的膝关节融合棒可能无法提供足够的稳定性。用于膝关节融合的长棒利用骨干实现稳定,并且在融合良好的情况下,若再次发生感染,长棒便于取出,具有额外优势。长髓内棒还具有可立即负重的额外优势。患侧肢体立即负重至关重要,因为这些患者术前常因疼痛和感染而无法负重。外固定技术有效,但存在针道问题。肥胖且软组织包膜较大的患者针道问题会更严重,而长髓内棒可避免此类患者出现针道问题。长髓内棒的抗生素骨水泥涂层还可实现局部抗生素递送。