La Grouw Yvonne, Bannink Duco, van Hout Hein
Department of Political Science & Public Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Departments of General Practice & Medicine of older people, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 28;7:489. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00489. eCollection 2020.
Frailty management focuses on optimizing the physical and psychological functioning of older people with frail health through early risk identification and intervention in primary care. Such care programs demand a joint effort by primary care professionals and older persons, one in which professionals are expected to promote or facilitate self-management practices and older persons are expected to adhere to the professional advice. It is known that patients and professionals hold different perspectives on frailty, but we know little about how this may affect their cooperation in frailty management. In this article, we therefore study how different perspectives of older persons and their primary care professionals play a role frailty management in practice. Nine cases of frailty management were reconstructed through semi-structured interviews with older persons, their family doctor and practice nurse. Drawing from literature on managing complex problems, we analyzed how "factual" and "normative" orientations played a role in their perspectives. We observe that the perspectives of care professionals and older persons on frailty management were substantially different. Both actors "manage" frailty, but they focus on different aspects of frailty and interestingly, care professionals' rationale is future-oriented whereas older person's rationale past-oriented. Primary care professionals employed practices to manage the medical and social factors of frailty in order to prevent future loss. Older persons employed practices to deal with the psychological, emotional and social aspects of the different types of loss they already experienced, in order to reconcile with loss from the past in the present. These findings raise fundamental questions regarding the different perceptions of and priorities around not only care for frail older people in general, but also implied professional-patient relations and the value of a risk-management approach to care for older people with frail health. The distinction between these perspectives could help care professionals to better respond to older patients' preferences and it could empower older persons to voice preferences and priorities that might not fit within the proposed care program.
衰弱管理侧重于通过在初级保健中早期识别风险并进行干预,来优化健康状况不佳的老年人的身体和心理功能。此类护理计划需要初级保健专业人员和老年人共同努力,在这一过程中,专业人员应促进或推动自我管理实践,而老年人则应遵循专业建议。众所周知,患者和专业人员对衰弱有不同的看法,但我们对这可能如何影响他们在衰弱管理中的合作却知之甚少。因此,在本文中,我们研究老年人及其初级保健专业人员的不同观点在实际衰弱管理中如何发挥作用。通过对老年人、他们的家庭医生和执业护士进行半结构化访谈,重构了九个衰弱管理案例。借鉴有关处理复杂问题的文献,我们分析了“事实性”和“规范性”取向在他们观点中所起的作用。我们观察到,护理专业人员和老年人对衰弱管理的观点存在很大差异。双方都在“管理”衰弱,但他们关注的是衰弱的不同方面,有趣的是,护理专业人员的理由是面向未来的,而老年人的理由是面向过去的。初级保健专业人员采用各种方法来管理衰弱的医疗和社会因素,以防止未来的损失。老年人则采用各种方法来应对他们已经经历的不同类型损失的心理、情感和社会方面,以便在当下与过去的损失达成和解。这些发现不仅引发了关于对体弱老年人护理的不同认知和优先事项的基本问题,还涉及隐含的医患关系以及对体弱老年人护理的风险管理方法的价值。这些观点之间的差异有助于护理专业人员更好地回应老年患者的偏好,也可以使老年人能够表达可能不符合提议护理计划的偏好和优先事项。