Locniskar M, McEniry D W, Mudd D W, Rose P, Lucas D C, Larrick J, McAdam K P
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1987 Jun;55(2):249-60.
Although the mechanism of immunologic unresponsiveness in lepromatous leprosy remains unknown, it has been shown that interleukin-2 (IL-2) production is defective in these patients. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from treated (less than 16 months) and untreated leprosy patients as well as household contacts; age, sex, ethnically matched control subjects; and laboratory staff. PBMC were cultured for 6 days with sonicated Mycobacterium leprae (1-10 micrograms/ml), Dharmendra lepromin (1:10), or phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) (0.05-5.0 micrograms/ml) in medium supplemented with various concentrations of recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) or cultured for 3 days with one of the three mycobacterial antigens in the presence of concanavalin A (ConA). TT/BT patients and household control subjects had a robust response to M. leprae and lepromin, but were unresponsive to PGL-I delivered in liposomes. PBMC from LL patients did not respond to any of the three antigen preparations. rIL-2 induced proliferation of PBMC both in leprosy patients and control subjects regardless of the presence or absence of the three leprosy antigen preparations. This antigen nonspecific augmentation of proliferation by the wide range of doses of rIL-2 employed makes difficult the interpretation of the enhanced thymidine incorporation noted when rIL-2 is added in the presence of antigen to cultures of lymphocytes from LL patients. Our studies are at variance with reports that leprosy antigens, specifically PGL-I, induce immunological suppression, in that mycobacterial antigens did not cause significant suppression of the ConA-induced proliferations of PBMC from patients.
虽然瘤型麻风免疫无反应性的机制尚不清楚,但已表明这些患者的白细胞介素-2(IL-2)产生存在缺陷。从接受治疗(不到16个月)和未接受治疗的麻风患者以及家庭接触者、年龄、性别、种族匹配的对照受试者和实验室工作人员中分离外周血单核细胞(PBMC)。将PBMC与超声处理的麻风分枝杆菌(1 - 10微克/毫升)、达曼德拉麻风菌素(1:10)或酚糖脂-I(PGL-I)(0.05 - 5.0微克/毫升)在补充有不同浓度重组IL-2(rIL-2)的培养基中培养6天,或在伴刀豆球蛋白A(ConA)存在下与三种分枝杆菌抗原之一培养3天。结核样型/界线类偏结核样型患者和家庭对照受试者对麻风分枝杆菌和麻风菌素反应强烈,但对脂质体包裹的PGL-I无反应。瘤型麻风患者的PBMC对三种抗原制剂中的任何一种均无反应。无论是否存在三种麻风抗原制剂,rIL-2均能诱导麻风患者和对照受试者的PBMC增殖。使用的多种剂量rIL-2对增殖的这种抗原非特异性增强使得在将rIL-2添加到瘤型麻风患者淋巴细胞培养物的抗原存在时所观察到的胸苷掺入增强难以解释。我们的研究与麻风抗原(特别是PGL-I)诱导免疫抑制的报道不同,因为分枝杆菌抗原并未显著抑制患者PBMC的ConA诱导增殖。