School of Management and Marketing, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2020 Oct;28(5):509-513. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12660. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
This paper nuances the notion of access when considering minority segments and their use of health care services in rural communities. It argues that access needs to be considered as both the availability and the perceived ability to use a service without fear of retribution. By taking such a stance, this paper addresses the inequality in LGBTQI+ care in rural communities. It claims equitable care can only be achieved if the appropriate environment is created where individuals can disclose their identity and seek appropriate treatment. Given the complexity surrounding rural communities, their prevailing culture and perceptions, as well as stigmas and poor health outcome, a multilevel approach is taken to identify implications. It is argued that to address the individual and systemic barriers to equitable health care, a human rights-centred approach to health needs to be adopted considering the individual, the community and the health system.
当考虑少数民族群体及其在农村社区使用医疗服务时,本文对可及性的概念进行了细微的调整。它认为,可及性需要被视为可用性和感知能力的结合,即在使用服务时无需担心报复。通过采取这种立场,本文解决了农村社区中 LGBTQI+护理的不平等问题。它声称,如果创造了适当的环境,使个人能够披露自己的身份并寻求适当的治疗,那么只有这样才能实现公平的护理。考虑到农村社区的复杂性、其主流文化和观念,以及耻辱感和不良健康结果,本文采取了多层次的方法来确定其影响。有人认为,要解决公平医疗保健方面的个人和系统障碍,需要采取以人权为中心的健康方法,既要考虑个人,也要考虑社区和医疗体系。