Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;49(1):63-69. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12577. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
To compare patterns of dental caries, periodontal disease and dental care among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Central-West Brazilian subpopulations.
Data were from two population-based cross-sectional studies involving 5-, 12-, 15-19- and 35-44-year-olds. The first examined were the Guarani, Kaiowá, Terena and Kadiwéu Indigenous groups from Mato Grosso do Sul Brazilian state and the second comprised a non-Indigenous population. Mean numbers of sound teeth, decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft/DMFT), prevalence of poor oral hygiene for adults (35-44 years) and of periodontal disease were estimated. Restorative dental service utilization was measured using the Care Index.
The study populations comprised of 1830 Indigenous and 29 395 non-Indigenous people. The Kaiwoá ethnic group had the lowest DMFT among Indigenous groups for ages 12, 15-19 years; 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.1) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-2.9), respectively. The highest values were observed among the 12-year-old Terena ethnic group and 15- to 19-year-old Kadiwéo groups; 2.2 (95% CI 1.8-2.5) and 3.7 (95% CI 3.1-4.4), respectively. The mean DMFT values were significantly lower among Indigenous than non-Indigenous people for all age groups. The prevalence of bleeding and calculus was 70.3% (95% CI 64.5%-75.5%) and 80.1% (95% CI 74.8%-84.5%), respectively, for Indigenous people and 43.9% (95% CI 34.4%-50.7%) and 61.5% (95% CI 55.4%-67.2%), respectively, for the non-Indigenous population. Restorative services were higher among 5-year-old non-Indigenous children and adults than for Indigenous groups. Among Indigenous groups, the Terena had the highest level of restored teeth (38.0% at 12 years) and Kadiwéu the lowest level (8.8% at 12 years).
In our study, Indigenous people had a lower caries burden, but less access to restorative services than their non-Indigenous counterparts. These disparities likely reflect differences in historical, socioeconomic, cultural, environmental and political determinants that both groups have experienced differently over time.
比较巴西中西部土著和非土著亚人群的龋齿、牙周病和口腔保健模式。
数据来自两项基于人群的横断面研究,涉及 5 岁、12 岁、15-19 岁和 35-44 岁人群。第一项研究包括来自巴西马托格罗索州的瓜拉尼人、卡瓦伊瓦人、特伦纳人和卡迪维尤土著群体,第二项研究包括非土著人群。估计了恒牙数、患龋牙数、失牙数和补牙数(dmft/DMFT)、成年人(35-44 岁)口腔卫生不良的患病率和牙周病的患病率。使用保健指数衡量修复牙科服务的利用情况。
研究人群包括 1830 名土著人和 29395 名非土著人。在 12 岁、15-19 岁人群中,卡瓦伊瓦族的 DMFT 最低,分别为 0.9(95%CI 0.7-1.1)和 2.4(95%CI 1.9-2.9)。12 岁的特伦纳族和 15-19 岁的卡迪维尤族的数值最高,分别为 2.2(95%CI 1.8-2.5)和 3.7(95%CI 3.1-4.4)。在所有年龄组中,土著人群的平均 DMFT 值明显低于非土著人群。土著人群的出血和牙石患病率分别为 70.3%(95%CI 64.5%-75.5%)和 80.1%(95%CI 74.8%-84.5%),而非土著人群的相应患病率分别为 43.9%(95%CI 34.4%-50.7%)和 61.5%(95%CI 55.4%-67.2%)。5 岁的非土著儿童和成年人的修复治疗服务高于土著群体。在土著群体中,特伦纳族的补牙率最高(12 岁时为 38.0%),卡迪维尤族的补牙率最低(12 岁时为 8.8%)。
在我们的研究中,土著人群的龋齿负担较低,但修复服务的利用率低于非土著人群。这些差异可能反映了历史、社会经济、文化、环境和政治等决定因素的差异,这两个群体在不同时期都经历了这些差异。