Galindo Rodolfo J, Umpierrez Guillermo E, Rushakoff Robert J, Basu Ananda, Lohnes Suzanne, Nichols James H, Spanakis Elias K, Espinoza Juan, Palermo Nadine E, Awadjie Dessa Garnett, Bak Leigh, Buckingham Bruce, Cook Curtiss B, Freckmann Guido, Heinemann Lutz, Hovorka Roman, Mathioudakis Nestoras, Newman Tonya, O'Neal David N, Rickert Michaela, Sacks David B, Seley Jane Jeffrie, Wallia Amisha, Shang Trisha, Zhang Jennifer Y, Han Julia, Klonoff David C
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;14(6):1035-1064. doi: 10.1177/1932296820954163. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
This article is the work product of the Continuous Glucose Monitor and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline Panel, which was organized by Diabetes Technology Society and met virtually on April 23, 2020. The guideline panel consisted of 24 international experts in the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and automated insulin dosing (AID) systems representing adult endocrinology, pediatric endocrinology, obstetrics and gynecology, advanced practice nursing, diabetes care and education, clinical chemistry, bioengineering, and product liability law. The panelists reviewed the medical literature pertaining to five topics: (1) continuation of home CGMs after hospitalization, (2) initiation of CGMs in the hospital, (3) continuation of AID systems in the hospital, (4) logistics and hands-on care of hospitalized patients using CGMs and AID systems, and (5) data management of CGMs and AID systems in the hospital. The panelists then developed three types of recommendations for each topic, including clinical practice (to use the technology optimally), research (to improve the safety and effectiveness of the technology), and hospital policies (to build an environment for facilitating use of these devices) for each of the five topics. The panelists voted on 78 proposed recommendations. Based on the panel vote, 77 recommendations were classified as either strong or mild. One recommendation failed to reach consensus. Additional research is needed on CGMs and AID systems in the hospital setting regarding device accuracy, practices for deployment, data management, and achievable outcomes. This guideline is intended to support these technologies for the management of hospitalized patients with diabetes.
本文是由糖尿病技术协会组织、于2020年4月23日以线上形式召开会议的医院连续血糖监测和自动胰岛素给药系统共识指南小组的工作成果。该指南小组由24位国际专家组成,他们在成人内分泌学、儿科内分泌学、妇产科、高级实践护理、糖尿病护理与教育、临床化学、生物工程以及产品责任法等领域,专门从事连续血糖监测(CGM)和自动胰岛素给药(AID)系统的应用。小组成员回顾了与五个主题相关的医学文献:(1)住院后继续使用家庭CGM;(2)在医院启动CGM;(3)在医院继续使用AID系统;(4)使用CGM和AID系统的住院患者的后勤保障及实际护理;(5)医院中CGM和AID系统的数据管理。随后,小组成员针对每个主题制定了三种类型的建议,包括临床实践(以优化技术使用)、研究(以提高技术的安全性和有效性)以及医院政策(以营造便于使用这些设备的环境),涵盖五个主题中的每一个。小组成员对78条提议的建议进行了投票。根据小组投票结果,77条建议被归类为强或弱。有一条建议未能达成共识。在医院环境中,关于CGM和AID系统的设备准确性、部署实践、数据管理以及可实现的结果,还需要进一步研究。本指南旨在支持这些技术用于糖尿病住院患者的管理。