Hochfellner Daniel, Poettler Tina, Schoerghuber Michael, Lukic Edita, Yates Ameli, Keeling Ingeborg, Zimpfer Daniel, Aberer Felix, Berti Francesca, Lucarelli Fausto, Valgimigli Francesco, Mader Julia
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Division of Anesthesiology for Cardiovascular Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May 24:19322968251342598. doi: 10.1177/19322968251342598.
In critically ill patients, deviations in glucose levels may lead to significant harm to individuals with and without diabetes. Although subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (scCGM) has proven beneficial for patients in standard wards, its implementation in critical care settings has been limited due to multiple factors, potentially resulting in inadequate glycemic control and consequent complications; here, intravascular systems (ivCGM) have the potential to overcome these limitations.
This single-center, open-label study, aimed to assess accuracy and safety of a novel intravenous glucose monitoring system in patients with and without diabetes, admitted to a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit. Glucose levels were continuously monitored for up to 72 hours in the predefined glucose range of 20 to 400 mg/dL and compared with arterial glucose measurements (blood gas analyses [BGAs]).
Twenty-eight participants successfully completed the study, allowing the collection of 1224 ivCGM/BGA data pairs. Due to the exploratory nature of the trial in this vulnerable patient population, no data pairs <70 mg/dL and limited data pairs in level 2 hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL) were observed. A mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 8.7 ± 7.8% was found, whereas the mean absolute difference (MAD) for values <100 mg/dL was 3.3 ± 2.7 mg/dL. In participants with diabetes (N = 8332 ivCGM/BGA data pairs), MARD was 9.6 ± 8.1%. Diabetes Technology Society Error Grid (DTSEG) analysis revealed that all data pairs fell within clinically acceptable zones A and B. Notably, no serious adverse events associated with the device were observed during the study.
The present findings indicate that the investigated intravenous glucose monitoring system provides accurate glucose monitoring and demonstrates its safety in critical care settings. This technology offers promise for improved glycemic management in critically ill patients, particularly those with diabetes, potentially mitigating the associated risks and complications.
在危重症患者中,血糖水平偏差可能对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者造成严重伤害。尽管皮下连续血糖监测(scCGM)已被证明对标准病房的患者有益,但由于多种因素,其在重症监护环境中的应用受到限制,这可能导致血糖控制不佳及相应并发症;在此,血管内系统(ivCGM)有潜力克服这些限制。
这项单中心、开放标签研究旨在评估一种新型静脉血糖监测系统在入住心胸外科重症监护病房的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的准确性和安全性。在20至400mg/dL的预定义血糖范围内连续监测血糖水平长达72小时,并与动脉血糖测量值(血气分析[BGA])进行比较。
28名参与者成功完成了研究,共收集到1224对ivCGM/BGA数据。由于该试验针对这一脆弱患者群体具有探索性质,未观察到血糖水平<70mg/dL的数据对,且2级高血糖(>250mg/dL)的数据对有限。平均绝对相对差异(MARD)为8.7±7.8%,而血糖值<100mg/dL时的平均绝对差异(MAD)为3.3±2.7mg/dL。在糖尿病患者中(N = 8332对ivCGM/BGA数据),MARD为9.6±8.1%。糖尿病技术协会误差网格(DTSEG)分析显示,所有数据对均落在临床可接受的A区和B区。值得注意的是,研究期间未观察到与该设备相关的严重不良事件。
目前的研究结果表明,所研究的静脉血糖监测系统能够提供准确的血糖监测,并证明了其在重症监护环境中的安全性。这项技术有望改善危重症患者,尤其是糖尿病患者的血糖管理,潜在地降低相关风险和并发症。