• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项验证研究表明,在 PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 中,用于定性研究的检索过滤器在设计和性能上存在差异。

A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of search filters for qualitative research in PsycINFO and CINAHL.

机构信息

Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), Katharina-Heinroth-Ufer 1, 10787 Berlin, Germany.

Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), Katharina-Heinroth-Ufer 1, 10787 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.031
PMID:32987157
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Search filters can support qualitative evidence of information retrieval. Various search filters are available for the bibliographic databases PsycINFO and CINAHL. To date, no comparative overview of validation results of search filters verified with an independent gold standard exists.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Identified search filters for PsycINFO and CINAHL were tested for plausibility. Gold standards were generated according to the relative recall approach using references included in an overview of systematic reviews of qualitative studies. All included references were collected and checked for indexing in PsycINFO and CINAHL. Validation tests for each search filter were conducted in both databases to determine whether the references of the gold standards could be retrieved or not.

RESULTS

Twelve search filters for PsycINFO and fifteen for CINAHL were validated. The complexity and design of these search filters vary, as well as the validation results for the databases. When locating primary studies of qualitative research, the best sensitivity and precision ratio (among filters with a sensitivity of >80%) was achieved with a filter by McKibbon et al. for PsycINFO and a filter by Wilczynski et al. for CINAHL.

CONCLUSION

Project-specific requirements and resources influence the choice of a specific search filter for PsycINFO and CINAHL.

摘要

目的

搜索过滤器可以支持信息检索的定性证据。PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 这两个书目数据库都有各种搜索过滤器可供使用。迄今为止,尚无针对经过独立金标准验证的搜索过滤器的验证结果的比较性概述。

研究设计与设置

对 PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 的已识别搜索过滤器进行了合理性测试。金标准是根据相对召回率方法生成的,该方法使用定性研究系统综述中的参考文献。收集了所有包含的参考文献,并在 PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 中检查了它们的索引情况。在两个数据库中对每个搜索过滤器进行了验证测试,以确定是否可以检索到金标准的参考文献。

结果

对 12 个用于 PsycINFO 的搜索过滤器和 15 个用于 CINAHL 的搜索过滤器进行了验证。这些搜索过滤器的复杂性和设计各不相同,并且数据库的验证结果也各不相同。在定位定性研究的原始研究时,对于灵敏度>80%的过滤器,McKibbon 等人的过滤器在 PsycINFO 中以及 Wilczynski 等人的过滤器在 CINAHL 中达到了最佳的灵敏度和精度比。

结论

项目特定的要求和资源会影响在 PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 中选择特定搜索过滤器的决策。

相似文献

1
A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of search filters for qualitative research in PsycINFO and CINAHL.一项验证研究表明,在 PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 中,用于定性研究的检索过滤器在设计和性能上存在差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
2
A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of MEDLINE search filters for qualitative research.一项验证研究揭示了 MEDLINE 搜索过滤器在设计和性能方面存在差异,这些过滤器用于定性研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;120:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative study.评估方法学检索过滤器的性能以提高证据信息检索的效率:五项文献综述和一项定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(69):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta21690.
4
No suitable precise or optimized epidemiologic search filters were available for bibliographic databases.没有适合的精确或优化的流行病学搜索筛选器可用于文献数据库。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A comparison of search strategies.在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 中定位痴呆症的定性研究:搜索策略的比较。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Dec;9(4):579-586. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1280. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器:减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
7
Development of a search filter to identify reports of controlled clinical trials within CINAHL Plus.开发一个搜索筛选器,以在 CINAHL Plus 中识别对照临床试验报告。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Mar;36(1):73-90. doi: 10.1111/hir.12251. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.检索策略(筛选条件)以识别 MEDLINE 和 Embase 中的系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):MR000054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000054.pub2.
9
High-performance information search filters for CKD content in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE.高性能信息搜索筛选器,用于在 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中搜索 CKD 相关内容。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jan;65(1):26-32. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
Development and validation of search filters to find articles on palliative care in bibliographic databases.开发和验证用于在文献数据库中查找姑息治疗相关文章的检索过滤器。
Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;33(4):470-474. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824275. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The conduct and reporting of qualitative evidence syntheses in health and social care guidelines: a content analysis.卫生和社会保健指南中定性证据综合的实施和报告:内容分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01743-1.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of non-medical independent prescribing in primary care in the UK: a qualitative systematic review.英国初级保健中非医疗独立处方实施的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e052227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052227.