Suppr超能文献

年龄相关性黄斑变性继发黄斑下出血的治疗:三种治疗方式的比较

Management of a Submacular Hemorrhage Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparison of Three Treatment Modalities.

作者信息

Jeong Seongyong, Park Dong-Geun, Sagong Min

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, Korea.

Yeungnam Eye Center, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu 42415, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 24;9(10):3088. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103088.

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the effects of three treatment modalities for a submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Seventy-seven patients with an SMH were divided into three groups: small-sized (optic disc diameter (ODD) ≥ 1 to < 4), medium-sized (ODD ≥ 4 within the temporal arcade) and large-sized (ODD ≥ 4, exceeding the temporal arcade). Patients received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy, pneumatic displacement (PD) with anti-VEGF or a vitrectomy with a subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and gas tamponade based on the surgeon's discretion. The functional and anatomical outcomes were evaluated. Among the 77 eyes, 45 eyes had a small-sized, 21 eyes had a medium-sized and 11 eyes had a large-sized SMH. In the small-sized group, all treatment modalities showed a gradual best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement with high hemorrhagic regression or displacement rates (over 75%). In the medium-sized group, PD and surgery were associated with better BCVA with more displacement than anti-VEGF monotherapy (67% and 83%, respectively, vs. 33%). In the large-sized group, surgery showed a better visual improvement with a higher displacement rate than PD (86% vs. 25%). Our findings demonstrated that visual improvement can be expected through appropriate treatment strategy regardless of the SMH size. In cases with a larger SMH, invasive techniques including PD or surgery were more advantageous than anti-VEGF monotherapy.

摘要

本文旨在比较三种治疗方式对渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发的黄斑下出血(SMH)的疗效。77例SMH患者被分为三组:小尺寸组(视盘直径(ODD)≥1至<4)、中尺寸组(颞侧弓内ODD≥4)和大尺寸组(ODD≥4,超过颞侧弓)。患者根据外科医生的判断接受抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)单药治疗、抗VEGF联合气体置换术(PD)或玻璃体切除术联合视网膜下组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)及气体填塞。评估了功能和解剖学结果。在这77只眼中,45只眼为小尺寸SMH,21只眼为中尺寸SMH,11只眼为大尺寸SMH。在小尺寸组中,所有治疗方式均显示最佳矫正视力(BCVA)逐渐改善,出血消退或移位率较高(超过75%)。在中尺寸组中,与抗VEGF单药治疗相比,PD和手术与更好的BCVA及更多的移位相关(分别为67%和83%,而抗VEGF单药治疗为33%)。在大尺寸组中,手术显示出比PD更好的视力改善和更高的移位率(86%对25%)。我们的研究结果表明,无论SMH大小,通过适当的治疗策略都有望实现视力改善。在SMH较大的病例中,包括PD或手术在内的侵入性技术比抗VEGF单药治疗更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140b/7601376/f154df12e22d/jcm-09-03088-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验