Suppr超能文献

声带白斑恶变潜能的生物标志物:研究现状综述。

Biomarkers for Malignant Potential in Vocal Fold Leukoplakia: A State of the Art Review.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr;164(4):751-758. doi: 10.1177/0194599820957251. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore biomarkers that are candidates for understanding potential degeneration to malignancy of vocal fold leukoplakia (VFL), with the goal of guiding future diagnostic and treatment recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Medline search engines.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by searching the following key words: or , coupled with or , and combined with the term . We collated the biomarkers and their significance, followed by observing the power of their evidence by assessing the quality of the studies according to guidelines of tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK).

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic biomarkers in the 16 studies are generally divided into 3 categories according to their biological roles: proliferation (Ki-67, CK-1 RS14024 SNP), cell cycle control (P53, p16, cyclin D1, p57kip2, interleukin-10 [IL-10], miR-10a, and miR-34c), cell adhesion, and invasion (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, OPN/CD44v6 axis, MMP-1, vascular endothelial growth factor A, MMP-9, serpin peptidase inhibitor 1, plasminogen activator, CTNN/B1, β-catenin, NANOG, HERG1). The prognostic use of these biomarkers is limited due to the variable methodologies, study design, assay methods, and statistical analysis performed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Prognostic factors in vocal fold leukoplakia have important clinical implications regarding the potential for malignant degeneration. Although further study is needed, the currently available evidence suggests that p53, p16, cyclin D1, IL-10, NLR, OPN and CD44v6, CTNNB1, and CTTN and FAK might be of particular interest in determining prognosis of VFL as related to malignancy. Future, large, well-designed, prospective studies are expected to determine the prognostic power of these biomarkers before their implementation in routine clinical practice.

摘要

目的

探索候选生物标志物,以了解声带白斑(VFL)潜在恶变的机制,从而为未来的诊断和治疗建议提供指导。

资料来源

PubMed 和 Medline 搜索引擎。

研究方法

通过搜索以下关键词进行系统评价:或,加上或,结合术语。我们整理了生物标志物及其意义,然后根据肿瘤标志物预后研究指南(REMARK)评估研究质量来观察其证据的说服力。

结论

16 项研究中的预后生物标志物通常根据其生物学作用分为 3 类:增殖(Ki-67、CK-1 RS14024 SNP)、细胞周期控制(P53、p16、cyclin D1、p57kip2、白细胞介素-10 [IL-10]、miR-10a 和 miR-34c)、细胞黏附和侵袭(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、OPN/CD44v6 轴、MMP-1、血管内皮生长因子 A、MMP-9、丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂 1、纤溶酶原激活物、CTNN/B1、β-连环蛋白、NANOG、HERG1)。由于采用的方法学、研究设计、检测方法和统计分析存在差异,这些生物标志物的预后应用受到限制。

实践意义

声带白斑的预后因素对恶性转化的潜在可能性具有重要的临床意义。尽管需要进一步研究,但目前的证据表明,p53、p16、cyclin D1、IL-10、NLR、OPN 和 CD44v6、CTNNB1 和 CTTN 和 FAK 可能特别有助于确定 VFL 的恶性程度。未来,预计将开展大型、设计良好的前瞻性研究,以确定这些生物标志物在常规临床实践中的预后能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验