• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI 靶向或系统随机活检在初次活检前列腺癌患者中的诊断作用:一项类似 PRECISION 试验的回顾性队列研究随访。

MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.

机构信息

Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.

Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):406-413. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00290-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1038/s41391-020-00290-4
PMID:32989259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To test clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates during follow-up in biopsy naïve patients that underwent two different diagnostic pathways: (1) SB GROUP (n = 354): systematic random biopsies (SB) vs. (2) TB GROUP (n = 264): multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and only targeted biopsies (TB) of PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. Patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 score avoided prostate biopsies.

METHODS

Retrospective single centre study of 618 biopsy naive patients (2015-2018). Two different definitions of csPCa were used: (1) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (ISUP grade group [GG] ≥ 2) and (2) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariable Cox regression models tested rates over time of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 and caPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 in SB GROUP vs. TB GROUP.

RESULTS

At initial biopsy, TB achieved higher rates of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (35.3 vs. 18.9%; p < 0.001) and csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 (12.6 vs. 6.2%; p = 0.04), relative to SB. After a median time follow-up of 36 months, the rates of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (6.1 vs. 4.4%; p = 0.6) and csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 (3.3 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.2) were similar in SB GROUP vs. TB GROUP. Moreover, in TB GROUP patients that avoided prostate biopsies because of negative baseline mpMRI (n = 145), only 4.1% exhibited csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 during follow-up. Moreover, none of these patients (PI-RADS ≤ 2) had csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS

In biopsy naïve setting, a diagnostic pathway including pre-biopsy mpMRI and TB of only PCa suspicious lesions is not associated with higher rates of csPCa during follow-up, relative to a diagnostic pathway of SB. Moreover, patients with negative baseline mpMRI could safely avoid prostate biopsies and could be followed with repeated PSA testing, since only a small proportion of them would harbor csPCa.

摘要

背景

为了在接受两种不同诊断途径的初次活检患者中检测到临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的发生率:(1)SB 组(n=354):系统随机活检(SB)与(2)TB 组(n=264):多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和仅靶向 PI-RADS≥3 病变的靶向活检(TB)。PI-RADS 评分≤2 分的患者避免进行前列腺活检。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了 618 名初次活检患者(2015-2018 年)。使用了两种不同的 csPCa 定义:(1)csPCa ISUP GG≥2(ISUP 分级组 [GG]≥2)和(2)csPCa ISUP GG≥3。使用 Kaplan-Meier 图和单变量 Cox 回归模型检测 SB 组与 TB 组中 csPCa ISUP GG≥2 和 caPCa ISUP GG≥3 的时间发生率。

结果

初次活检时,TB 组的 csPCa ISUP GG≥2(35.3% vs. 18.9%;p<0.001)和 csPCa ISUP GG≥3(12.6% vs. 6.2%;p=0.04)的发生率高于 SB 组。中位随访 36 个月后,SB 组和 TB 组的 csPCa ISUP GG≥2(6.1% vs. 4.4%;p=0.6)和 csPCa ISUP GG≥3(3.3% vs. 1.1%;p=0.2)的发生率相似。此外,在 TB 组中,由于基线 mpMRI 为阴性而避免前列腺活检的 145 名患者中,仅 4.1%在随访期间出现 csPCa ISUP GG≥2。此外,这些患者中没有一个(PI-RADS≤2)出现 csPCa ISUP GG≥3。

结论

在初次活检的情况下,与 SB 组相比,包括术前 mpMRI 和仅对疑似前列腺癌病变进行 TB 的诊断途径与随访期间 csPCa 的发生率增加无关。此外,由于基线 mpMRI 为阴性而避免前列腺活检的患者可以安全地避免前列腺活检,并且可以通过重复 PSA 检测进行随访,因为只有一小部分患者会发生 csPCa。

相似文献

1
MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.MRI 靶向或系统随机活检在初次活检前列腺癌患者中的诊断作用:一项类似 PRECISION 试验的回顾性队列研究随访。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):406-413. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00290-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.MRI 靶向活检单独诊断而无伴随标准系统抽样的活检初筛男性行根治性前列腺切除术的病理发现。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):929.e11-929.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?在磁共振成像引导下前列腺靶向活检的时代,对于之前活检阴性的患者,是否仍需要重复进行系统性活检?
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
4
Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.MRI PI-RADS 3 病变中前列腺癌检出的预测因素——三级中心的现实。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Dec 20;95(4):11830. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11830.
5
[Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].[基于MRI的PI-RADS评分与靶向活检病理结果的关系分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):942-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220805-00538.
6
A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.基于多参数磁共振成像检查结果,为国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级分组(GG)1 或 ISUP GG2 前列腺癌患者制定的主动监测候选者的新型列线图。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):104-113. doi: 10.1111/bju.15048. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.靶向多参数磁共振成像/经直肠超声引导(mpMRI/TRUS)融合前列腺活检与系统随机前列腺活检:一项比较真实世界的研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;7(2):e1962. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1962. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.有可见病灶的男性中,系统与靶向磁共振成像/超声融合前列腺活检的比较。
J Urol. 2022 Jan;207(1):108-117. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002120. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
10
Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.MRI/TRUS 融合引导活检与系统前列腺活检在初次活检阴性和接受主动监测的患者中的诊断性能比较。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jun;73(3):357-366. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03758-3. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study.单纯认知靶向前列腺活检用于诊断选定的初诊患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:一项回顾性试点研究的结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;14(15):1643. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151643.
2
Can we predict pathology without surgery? Weighing the added value of multiparametric MRI and whole prostate radiomics in integrative machine learning models.能否不通过手术预测病理?多参数 MRI 和全前列腺放射组学在整合机器学习模型中的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6241-6253. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10699-3. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Monoparametric high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI as a possible first step in an MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
单参数高分辨率扩散加权磁共振成像作为疑似前列腺癌男性患者磁共振成像引导诊断路径中可能的第一步。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 31;13:1102860. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102860. eCollection 2023.
4
Construction and Comparison of Different Models in Detecting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.检测前列腺癌及临床显著性前列腺癌不同模型的构建与比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 12;12:911725. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911725. eCollection 2022.
5
Association between previous negative biopsies and lower rates of progression during active surveillance for prostate cancer.前列腺癌主动监测中,既往阴性活检与较低进展率之间的关联。
World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1447-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03983-8. Epub 2022 Mar 26.