Suppr超能文献

静脉注射美西林与其他β-内酰胺类药物作为针对尿路感染为源头的大肠埃希菌或克雷伯菌属菌血症的靶向治疗比较。

Intravenous mecillinam compared with other β-lactams as targeted treatment for Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. bacteraemia with urinary tract focus.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 52, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

The Hospital Pharmacy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 25D, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):206-211. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa411.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mecillinam (amdinocillin) is active against Gram-negative bacteria. Clinical data on the efficacy of IV mecillinam for severe urinary tract infections is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of targeted IV mecillinam compared with other β-lactams for bacteraemia with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. and a urinary tract focus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at five university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to compare the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality or bacteraemia recurrence within 30 days) between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin, cefuroxime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem.

RESULTS

We included 1129 patients in the primary analysis, of which 146 were given IV mecillinam as targeted treatment. We found no significant difference in the primary endpoint between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin and cefuroxime, but found a higher risk for the primary endpoint in the piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem groups, with adjusted HRs of 2.22 (95% CI 1.24-3.97, P < 0.01) and 2.48 (95% CI 1.04-5.93, P = 0.04), respectively, compared with mecillinam.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that IV mecillinam may be a suitable targeted treatment for bacteraemia with a urinary tract focus. However, these results need confirmation by randomized controlled studies.

摘要

背景

美西林(氨丁卡西林)对革兰氏阴性菌具有活性。关于静脉注射美西林治疗严重尿路感染的临床疗效数据较少。

目的

评估靶向静脉注射美西林与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗大肠埃希菌和克雷伯氏菌引起的菌血症和尿路感染的疗效。

患者和方法

我们在丹麦首都地区的五所大学医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,时间为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归比较接受美西林与氨苄西林、头孢呋辛、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南治疗的患者的主要复合终点(30 天内全因死亡率或菌血症复发)。

结果

我们在主要分析中纳入了 1129 名患者,其中 146 名患者接受了静脉注射美西林作为靶向治疗。我们发现接受美西林与氨苄西林和头孢呋辛治疗的患者在主要终点方面没有显著差异,但哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和美罗培南组的主要终点风险更高,调整后的 HR 分别为 2.22(95%CI 1.24-3.97,P<0.01)和 2.48(95%CI 1.04-5.93,P=0.04),与美西林相比。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,静脉注射美西林可能是治疗尿路感染相关菌血症的一种合适的靶向治疗方法。然而,这些结果需要通过随机对照研究来证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验