Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Evidera, Waltham, MA, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Feb;39(2):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00964-w. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
Decision-analytic models used in economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have characterized disease progression and accrue quality-adjusted life-years from utility values based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the occurrence of relapses, and progression to secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). The EDSS, used to characterize disability progression, has several limitations. If the EDSS is the only disability measure used in economic evaluations, the long-term clinical and economic implications of disease-modifying therapies may not be properly assessed.
The objective of this study was to explore if supplementary disability measures including the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) significantly contribute additional information on health utility in RRMS and SPMS otherwise not captured by the EDSS and relapses and, therefore, should be considered in future economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies.
Short-Form Six-Dimension utility scores were derived from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 individual-level data available in the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessment Consortium (MSOAC) Placebo Database. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models were conducted to estimate the effects of EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT (dominant and non-dominant hand), PASAT, and relapses on changes in utility over time, controlling for demographics.
A higher level of EDSS, longer time to complete the T25FW test, and a recent relapse were significant predictors of lower utility in people with RRMS and SPMS. 9HPT and PASAT were not significant predictors.
This study suggests that in addition to EDSS and recent relapses, T25FW significantly predicts utility in RRMS and SPMS. These findings support the use of T25FW to supplement the EDSS and the occurrence of relapses to characterize the course of disease progression and to more accurately accrue quality-adjusted life-years in future economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of RRMS.
用于评估缓解复发型多发性硬化症(RRMS)疾病修饰疗法的决策分析模型,已经从效用值方面根据扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)、复发的发生以及向继发进展型多发性硬化症(SPMS)的进展来描述疾病进展并累计质量调整生命年。用于描述残疾进展的 EDSS 具有一些局限性。如果 EDSS 是经济评估中唯一使用的残疾衡量标准,那么疾病修饰疗法的长期临床和经济影响可能无法得到适当评估。
本研究旨在探讨补充残疾衡量标准,包括定时 25 英尺步行测试(T25FW)、9 孔钉测试(9HPT)和听觉连续加法测试(PASAT),是否能显著提供 RRMS 和 SPMS 中健康效用方面的其他信息,而这些信息无法通过 EDSS 和复发来捕捉,因此应在未来的疾病修饰疗法经济评估中考虑这些信息。
从 RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 个人层面的数据中得出短期六维度效用评分,这些数据可从多发性硬化症结果评估联盟(MSOAC)安慰剂数据库中获得。采用重复测量混合效应模型来估计 EDSS、T25FW、9HPT(惯用手和非惯用手)、PASAT 和复发对随时间变化的效用的影响,同时控制了人口统计学因素。
EDSS 水平较高、T25FW 测试完成时间较长以及最近复发是 RRMS 和 SPMS 患者效用降低的显著预测因素。9HPT 和 PASAT 不是显著的预测因素。
本研究表明,除 EDSS 和最近的复发外,T25FW 也能显著预测 RRMS 和 SPMS 中的效用。这些发现支持在未来 RRMS 疾病修饰疗法的经济评估中使用 T25FW 来补充 EDSS 和复发的发生,以描述疾病进展过程,并更准确地累计质量调整生命年。