• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺动脉高压患者的二尖瓣手术:微创手术安全吗?

Mitral Valve Surgery in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Safe?

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.147. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.147
PMID:32991840
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared with conventional full sternotomy (FS) approaches, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) offers improved cosmesis, decreased pain and bleeding, and faster recovery without compromising repair or survival rates. However, little is known about outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed between 2002 and 2019 for all adult patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery. Patients with PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg) were stratified by FS or MIMVS, and nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 591 operations (317 MIMVS, 274 FS) met inclusion criteria during the study period. Nearest-neighbor propensity matching generated 112 well-matched pairs. Cardiopulmonary bypass (137 vs 89.5 minutes, P < .001), cross-clamp (102 vs 63 minutes, P < .001), and total operative times (241 vs 178.5 minutes, P < .001) were longer for the MIMVS group. Postoperatively, MIMVS was associated with shorter initial ventilator times (6 vs 9.6 hours, P < .001) and hospital lengths of stay (7 vs 8 days, P = .049), as well as blood product usage rates (26.8% vs 41.1%, P = .03). Survival at 30 days (0.0% vs 2.7%, P = .12) and 10 years (log-rank, P = .661) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MIMVS is safe in patients with PH and provides traditional benefits of minimally invasive surgery, including shorter initial ventilator times and hospital length of stay, without compromising on long-term survival.

摘要

背景

与传统的完全胸骨切开术(FS)相比,微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)具有改善美容效果、减少疼痛和出血以及更快恢复的优势,而不会影响修复或生存率。然而,对于肺动脉高压(PH)患者的结局,人们知之甚少,PH 是发病率和死亡率的独立危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析了 2002 年至 2019 年期间所有接受单纯二尖瓣手术的成年患者。根据 FS 或 MIMVS 将 PH 患者(平均肺动脉压≥25mmHg)进行分层,并进行最近邻倾向评分匹配以调整基线特征的差异。

结果

在研究期间,共有 591 例手术(317 例 MIMVS,274 例 FS)符合纳入标准。最近邻倾向评分匹配生成了 112 对匹配良好的病例。MIMVS 组体外循环(137 与 89.5 分钟,P<0.001)、主动脉阻断(102 与 63 分钟,P<0.001)和总手术时间(241 与 178.5 分钟,P<0.001)较长。术后,MIMVS 与较短的初始呼吸机时间(6 与 9.6 小时,P<0.001)和住院时间(7 与 8 天,P=0.049)以及血液制品使用率(26.8%与 41.1%,P=0.03)相关。30 天(0.0%与 2.7%,P=0.12)和 10 年(对数秩,P=0.661)的生存率在两组之间相似。

结论

MIMVS 在 PH 患者中是安全的,并且提供了微创外科手术的传统益处,包括较短的初始呼吸机时间和住院时间,而不会影响长期生存。

相似文献

1
Mitral Valve Surgery in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Safe?肺动脉高压患者的二尖瓣手术:微创手术安全吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.147. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Does full sternotomy have more significant impact than the cardiopulmonary bypass time in patients of mitral valve surgery?在二尖瓣手术患者中,全胸骨切开术比体外循环时间的影响更显著吗?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Apr 14;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0719-4.
3
Right Ventricular Function After Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.微创二尖瓣手术后的右心室功能。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Apr;36(4):1073-1080. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.08.035. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Long-term results after mitral valve surgery using minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach: a propensity matched comparison of a large single-center series.微创与胸骨切开术行二尖瓣手术的长期结果:一项大型单中心系列的倾向匹配比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02121-3.
5
Operative Outcomes of Concomitant Minimally Invasive Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.同期微创二尖瓣和三尖瓣手术的手术结果
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Oct;14(5):412-418. doi: 10.1177/1556984519864939. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Less invasive versus conventional heart valve surgery in patients with severe heart failure.中重度心力衰竭患者的微创与常规心脏瓣膜手术比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;148(1):161-167.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.029. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
7
Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery.微创入路与胸骨切开术治疗二尖瓣手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Heart. 2019 May;105(10):783-789. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314049. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
Effect of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery compared to sternotomy on short- and long-term outcomes: a retrospective multicentre interventional cohort study based on Netherlands Heart Registration.微创二尖瓣手术与胸骨切开术对短期和长期结果的影响:基于荷兰心脏注册的回顾性多中心干预队列研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 2;61(5):1099-1106. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab507.
9
Minimally invasive versus sternotomy mitral valve surgery when initiating a minimally invasive programme.启动微创二尖瓣手术项目时,微创与胸骨切开二尖瓣手术的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Dec 1;58(6):1168-1174. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa232.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Right Ventricle Function: The Role of the Forgotten Chamber in Mitral Valve Surgery.右心室功能:被遗忘的腔室在二尖瓣手术中的作用
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 9;27(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02151-1.
2
Robotic and endoscopic mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.用于退行性疾病的机器人辅助和内镜下二尖瓣修复术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov;11(6):614-621. doi: 10.21037/acs-2022-rmvs-28.
3
The Impact of Biomedical Engineering on the Development of Minimally Invasive Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.生物医学工程对微创心胸外科发展的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 28;10(17):3877. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173877.