Department of Neurology & Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, United States.
Center for Populations Health Research, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105331. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105331. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Inter-hospital transfer for ischemic stroke is an essential part of stroke system of care. This study aimed to understand the national patterns and outcomes of ischemic stroke transfer.
This retrospective study examined Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years undergoing inter-hospital transfer for ischemic stroke in 2012. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare 30-day and one-year mortality between transferred patients and direct admissions from the emergency department (ED admissions). Among 312,367 ischemic stroke admissions, 5.7% underwent inter-hospital transfer. Using this value as cut-off, the hospitals were classified into receiving (n = 411), sending (n = 559), and low-transfer (n = 1863) hospitals. Receiving hospitals were larger than low-transfer and sending hospitals as demonstrated by the median bed number (371, 189, and 88, respectively, p < 0.001); more frequently to be certified stroke centers (75%, 47%, and 16%, respectively, p < 0.001); and less commonly located in the rural area (2%, 7%, and 24%, respectively, p < 0.001). For receiving hospitals, transfer-in patients and ED admissions had comparable mortality at 30 days (10% vs 10%; adjusted HR [aHR]=1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14) and 1 year (23% vs 24%; aHR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.08). For sending hospitals, transfer-out patients, compared to ED admissions, had higher mortality at 30 days (14% vs 11%; aHR=1.63; 95% CI, 1.39-1.91) and 1 year (30% vs 27%; aHR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.48). For low-transfer hospitals, overall transfer-in and transfer-out patients, compared to ED admissions, had higher mortality at 30 days (13% vs 10%; aHR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.60) and 1 year (28% vs 25%; aHR=1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.36).
Hospitals in the US, based on their transfer patterns, could be classified into 3 groups that shared distinct characteristics including hospital size, rural vs urban location, and stroke certification. Transferred patients at sending and low-transfer hospitals had worse outcomes than their ED admission counterpart.
医院间的缺血性脑卒中转移是脑卒中治疗体系的重要组成部分。本研究旨在了解缺血性脑卒中转移的全国模式和结果。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年在 Medicare 受益人中年龄≥65 岁且接受医院间缺血性脑卒中转移的患者。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了转移患者和直接从急诊室(ED 入院)入院的 30 天和 1 年死亡率。在 312367 例缺血性脑卒中入院患者中,有 5.7%的患者进行了医院间转移。以此值为截点,将医院分为接收(n=411)、发送(n=559)和低转移(n=1863)医院。接收医院的床位数中位数明显大于低转移和发送医院(分别为 371、189 和 88,p<0.001);更可能是经认证的脑卒中中心(分别为 75%、47%和 16%,p<0.001);更不可能位于农村地区(分别为 2%、7%和 24%,p<0.001)。对于接收医院,转移入院患者和 ED 入院患者在 30 天(10%对 10%;调整后的 HR[aHR]=1.07;95%CI,0.99-1.14)和 1 年(23%对 24%;aHR=1.03;95%CI,0.99-1.08)的死亡率相似。对于发送医院,与 ED 入院患者相比,转出患者在 30 天(14%对 11%;aHR=1.63;95%CI,1.39-1.91)和 1 年(30%对 27%;aHR=1.33;95%CI,1.20-1.48)的死亡率更高。对于低转移医院,与 ED 入院患者相比,整体转入和转出患者在 30 天(13%对 10%;aHR=1.46;95%CI,1.33-1.60)和 1 年(28%对 25%;aHR=1.27;95%CI,1.19-1.36)的死亡率更高。
美国的医院可根据其转移模式分为 3 组,每组具有不同的特征,包括医院规模、城乡位置和脑卒中认证。发送和低转移医院的转移患者预后较 ED 入院患者更差。