• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性脑血管损伤筛查标准应包括机动车事故特征。

Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening Criteria Should Include Motor Vehicle Crash Characteristics.

机构信息

Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):390-395. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951475. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/0003134820951475
PMID:32993322
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current screening criteria miss 30% of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading BCVI mechanism, and delineating MVC characteristics associated with BCVI formation may augment current screening criteria.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified BCVI Denver injury screening criteria as able from the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database. Severe MVC markers were considered: mean change in velocity (delta-v) greater than 40 km/hour, steering wheel airbag deployment, ejection, or rollover.

RESULTS

93 BCVIs were included. Injury screening criteria were not present in 37/93 (39.8%) BCVIs. Vertebral BCVI more often had injury screening criteria than internal carotid BCVIs (73.2% vs 26.8%, = .001). There was a significant difference in delta-v (30.78 km/hour vs 51.00 km/hour, < .001) between BCVI with and without injury screening criteria. BCVI without injury screening criteria more often had safety device use through seatbelt position snug across the hips (94.6% vs 74.5%, = .01) and pretensioner deployment (92.6% vs 70.2%, = .04). Examining only drivers, BCVI without injury screening criteria more often had steering wheel airbag deployment (89.7% vs 68.9%, = .05). Markers of severe MVC were seen in 36/37 (97.3%) BCVIs without injury screening criteria.

DISCUSSION

BCVI without injury screening criteria occurred during higher deceleration MVCs with more frequent/appropriate safety device use, suggesting crash deceleration as a mechanism of BCVI formation. Expanding BCVI screening criteria to encompass severe MVCs may lessen the number of BCVI missed.

摘要

背景

目前的筛选标准会漏掉 30%的钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)。机动车碰撞(MVC)是导致 BCVI 的主要机制,明确与 BCVI 形成相关的 MVC 特征可能会增加当前的筛选标准。

方法

我们从 Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network(CIREN)数据库中回顾性地确定了 BCVI 丹佛筛选标准。严重 MVC 标志物包括:速度变化(delta-v)大于 40 公里/小时、方向盘安全气囊展开、弹射或翻车。

结果

93 例 BCVI 患者入选。37/93(39.8%)例 BCVI 患者无损伤筛选标准。与颈内动脉 BCVI 相比,椎动脉 BCVI 更常见符合损伤筛选标准(73.2% vs 26.8%, =.001)。有损伤筛选标准和无损伤筛选标准的 BCVI 之间 delta-v 差异有统计学意义(30.78 公里/小时 vs 51.00 公里/小时, <.001)。无损伤筛选标准的 BCVI 更常见安全带位置舒适地横跨臀部(94.6% vs 74.5%, =.01)和预紧器展开(92.6% vs 70.2%, =.04)。仅检查驾驶员,无损伤筛选标准的 BCVI 更常见方向盘安全气囊展开(89.7% vs 68.9%, =.05)。无损伤筛选标准的 37 例 BCVI 中有 36 例(97.3%)存在严重 MVC 标志物。

讨论

无损伤筛选标准的 BCVI 发生在减速幅度更大的 MVC 中,安全装置使用更频繁/更合适,这表明碰撞减速是 BCVI 形成的机制。扩大 BCVI 筛选标准以涵盖严重 MVC 可能会减少漏诊的 BCVI 数量。

相似文献

1
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening Criteria Should Include Motor Vehicle Crash Characteristics.钝性脑血管损伤筛查标准应包括机动车事故特征。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):390-395. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951475. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Improving blunt cerebrovascular injury screening in motor vehicle collision patients: Does airbag deployment matter?改善机动车碰撞患者钝性脑血管损伤的筛查:安全气囊展开有影响吗?
Am J Surg. 2022 Dec;224(6):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.037. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Cervical seatbelt sign is not associated with blunt cerebrovascular injury in children: A review of the national trauma databank.颈安全带征与儿童钝性脑血管损伤无关:国家创伤数据库综述。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Fall downs should not fall out: Blunt cerebrovascular injury in geriatric patients after low-energy trauma is common.跌倒不应被忽视:老年患者低能量创伤后钝性脑血管损伤很常见。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jun;86(6):1010-1014. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002241.
5
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: The case for universal screening.钝性脑血管损伤:普遍筛查的理由。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):880-886. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002824.
6
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in severe traumatic brain injury: incidence, risk factors, and evolution.严重创伤性脑损伤中的钝性脑血管损伤:发生率、危险因素和演变。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):16-22. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152600. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
7
A cohort study of blunt cerebrovascular injury screening in children: Are they just little adults?儿童钝性脑血管损伤筛查的队列研究:他们只是小成年人吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jan;84(1):50-57. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001631.
8
Lower incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury among young, properly restrained children: An ATOMAC multicenter study.年轻、正确约束的儿童中钝性脑血管损伤发生率较低:ATOMAC 多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Sep 1;95(3):334-340. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003900. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
9
Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: the McGovern screening score.小儿钝性脑血管损伤:麦戈文筛查评分
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):639-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.PEDS17498. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
The Natural History of Indeterminate Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.未确定的钝性脑血管损伤的自然史。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):841-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1692.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.Willis 环解剖结构和扫描实践对钝性脑血管损伤结果的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 17;32(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01225-x.
2
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Are We Overscreening Low-Mechanism Trauma?钝性脑血管损伤:我们是否过度筛查低机制创伤?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1296-1301. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8004. Epub 2023 Oct 12.