• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social rank modulates how environmental quality influences cooperation and conflict within animal societies.社会等级调节着环境质量如何影响动物社会中的合作与冲突。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201720. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1720.
2
Ecological Transitions in Grouping Benefits Explain the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality.群体组合效益中的生态转变解释了环境质量与社会性之间的悖论。
Am Nat. 2020 May;195(5):818-832. doi: 10.1086/708185. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Escalated conflict in a social hierarchy.社会等级制度中升级的冲突。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):2977-84. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3669.
4
A chemically triggered transition from conflict to cooperation in burying beetles.化学诱导的埋葬甲虫从冲突到合作的转变。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Mar;23(3):467-475. doi: 10.1111/ele.13445. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Asymmetry within social groups: division of labour and intergroup competition.社会群体内部的不对称性:劳动分工与群体间竞争。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Mar;29(3):560-71. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12805. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
6
Reproductive conflict and the costs of social status in cooperatively breeding vertebrates.合作繁殖脊椎动物中的生殖冲突与社会地位成本
Am Nat. 2009 May;173(5):650-61. doi: 10.1086/597606.
7
Antagonistic effects of intraspecific cooperation and interspecific competition on thermal performance.种内合作和种间竞争对热性能的拮抗作用。
Elife. 2020 Aug 18;9:e57022. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57022.
8
The effects of social rank and payoff structure on the evolution of group hunting.社会等级和收益结构对群体狩猎进化的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0269522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269522. eCollection 2022.
9
Climate-mediated cooperation promotes niche expansion in burying beetles.气候介导的合作促进了埋葬甲虫的生态位扩展。
Elife. 2014 May 13;3:e02440. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02440.
10
Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats.从属者的杀婴行为会影响合作繁殖的狐獴的生殖共享。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):385-7. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0463.

引用本文的文献

1
The ecology of wealth inequality in animal societies.动物社会中的财富不平等的生态学。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 May 11;289(1974):20220500. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0500. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Sex-specific influence of communal breeding experience on parenting performance and fitness in a burying beetle.群居繁殖经历对埋葬虫养育行为和适合度的性别特异性影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Feb 16;9(2):211179. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211179. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Pathogen Threat and In-group Cooperation.病原体威胁与群体内合作。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 29;12:678188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678188. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological Transitions in Grouping Benefits Explain the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality.群体组合效益中的生态转变解释了环境质量与社会性之间的悖论。
Am Nat. 2020 May;195(5):818-832. doi: 10.1086/708185. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Extreme and Variable Climatic Conditions Drive the Evolution of Sociality in Australian Rodents.极端和多变的气候条件推动了澳大利亚啮齿动物社会性的进化。
Curr Biol. 2020 Feb 24;30(4):691-697.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
A chemically triggered transition from conflict to cooperation in burying beetles.化学诱导的埋葬甲虫从冲突到合作的转变。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Mar;23(3):467-475. doi: 10.1111/ele.13445. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Resolving the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality: The Ecological Causes and Consequences of Cooperative Breeding in Two Lineages of Birds.解决环境质量与社会性之间的悖论:两种鸟类合作繁殖的生态原因和后果。
Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):207-216. doi: 10.1086/704090. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Adversity and cooperation in heterogeneous pairs.逆境与异质对的合作。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46624-8.
6
Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict.气候作为武装冲突的一个风险因素。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7764):193-197. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
7
Multiple benefits of alloparental care in a fluctuating environment.在波动环境中异亲照料的多重益处。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 21;5(2):172406. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172406. eCollection 2018 Feb.
8
Who needs 'lazy' workers? Inactive workers act as a 'reserve' labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed.谁需要“懒惰”的工人?不活跃的工人充当替代活跃工人的“储备”劳动力,但不活跃的工人被移除时却不会被替代。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184074. eCollection 2017.
9
Burying beetles regulate the microbiome of carcasses and use it to transmit a core microbiota to their offspring.埋葬甲调节尸骸的微生物组,并利用它将核心微生物组传递给后代。
Mol Ecol. 2018 Apr;27(8):1980-1991. doi: 10.1111/mec.14269. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals.气候与哺乳动物合作繁殖的分布
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160897. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160897. eCollection 2017 Jan.

社会等级调节着环境质量如何影响动物社会中的合作与冲突。

Social rank modulates how environmental quality influences cooperation and conflict within animal societies.

机构信息

Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.

Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201720. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1720.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2020.1720
PMID:32993473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7542804/
Abstract

Although dominance hierarchies occur in most societies, our understanding of how these power structures influence individual investment in cooperative and competitive behaviours remains elusive. Both conflict and cooperation in animal societies are often environmentally regulated, yet how individuals alter their cooperative and competitive investments as environmental quality changes remain unclear. Using game theoretic modelling, we predict that individuals of all ranks will invest more in cooperation and less in social conflict in harsh environments than individuals of the same ranks in benign environments. Counterintuitively, low-ranking subordinates should increase their investment in cooperation proportionally more than high-ranking dominants, suggesting that subordinates contribute relatively more when facing environmental challenges. We then test and confirm these predictions experimentally using the Asian burying beetle . Ultimately, we demonstrate how social rank modulates the relationships between environmental quality and cooperative and competitive behaviours, a topic crucial for understanding the evolution of complex societies.

摘要

尽管统治等级制度在大多数社会中都存在,但我们对于这些权力结构如何影响个体在合作和竞争行为中的投入的理解仍然难以捉摸。动物社会中的冲突和合作通常受到环境的调节,但个体如何随着环境质量的变化而改变其合作和竞争的投入尚不清楚。通过博弈论建模,我们预测所有等级的个体在恶劣环境中比在良性环境中投入更多的合作和更少的社会冲突。与直觉相反的是,低等级的下属应该比高等级的支配者更成比例地增加合作投入,这表明下属在面临环境挑战时贡献相对更多。然后,我们使用亚洲埋葬甲虫 进行了实验验证和确认。最终,我们展示了社会等级如何调节环境质量与合作和竞争行为之间的关系,这是理解复杂社会进化的关键话题。