• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者功能性二尖瓣反流和心房颤动的后果。

Consequences of functional mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Center for Innovation and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Dec;39(12):1398-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2020.08.020
PMID:32994093
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (FMR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the impact of FMR and AF on clinical outcomes is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognostic significance of FMR and AF in patients with LVADs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our center between January 2010 and December 2017. We defined significant FMR as the ratio of MR color jet area to left atrial area of >20% and persistent or permanent AF (PeAF) as persistent or permanent AF at LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 6 groups: patients with no PeAF and no significant FMR (Group 1), patients with no PeAF but with significant FMR (Group 2), patients with PeAF but no significant FMR (Group 3), patients with PeAF and significant FMR (Group 4), patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) at LVAD implantation and without PeAF (Group 5), and patients with concomitant MVS and with PeAF (Group 6). A total of 56 patients (15%) died within 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a 2-year survival of 81% in Group 1, 89% in Group 2, 87% in Group 3, 47% in Group 4, 87% in Group 5, and 79 % in Group 6 (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that classification in Group 4 was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% CI: 2.19-8.46; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The coexistence of significant FMR and PeAF may represent a poor prognostic marker in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

摘要

背景

功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)和心房颤动(AF)在接受左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的患者中很常见。然而,FMR 和 AF 对临床结局的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在探讨 FMR 和 AF 在 LVAD 患者中的特征和预后意义。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在我院接受 LVAD 植入的所有患者。我们将显著的 FMR 定义为 MR 彩色射流面积与左心房面积的比值>20%,并将持续性或永久性 AF(PeAF)定义为 LVAD 植入时的持续性或永久性 AF。

结果

共有 380 例患者纳入本分析。患者被分为 6 组:无 PeAF 且无显著 FMR(组 1)、无 PeAF 但有显著 FMR(组 2)、有 PeAF 但无显著 FMR(组 3)、有 PeAF 且有显著 FMR(组 4)、在 LVAD 植入时同时进行二尖瓣手术(MVS)且无 PeAF(组 5)和同时进行 MVS 且有 PeAF(组 6)。共有 56 例患者(15%)在 2 年内死亡。Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析显示,组 1 的 2 年生存率为 81%,组 2 为 89%,组 3 为 87%,组 4 为 47%,组 5 为 87%,组 6 为 79%(对数秩检验,p<0.001)。多变量 Cox 比例风险模型显示,组 4 分类是死亡率的独立预测因素(风险比,4.31;95%可信区间:2.19-8.46;p<0.001)。

结论

在接受 LVAD 植入的患者中,显著的 FMR 和 PeAF 共存可能代表预后不良的标志物。

相似文献

1
Consequences of functional mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者功能性二尖瓣反流和心房颤动的后果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Dec;39(12):1398-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With HeartMate 3.心脏再同步治疗 3 号患者中房颤对功能性三尖瓣反流的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e018334. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018334. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Clinical impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.HeartMate II 左心室辅助装置患者心房颤动的临床影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Nov 4;64(18):1883-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.989. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
4
Functional mitral regurgitation: predictor for atrial substrate remodeling and poor ablation outcome in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.功能性二尖瓣反流:阵发性心房颤动中心房基质重塑和消融效果不佳的预测指标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(30):e4333. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004333.
5
Impact of atrial fibrillation on improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心房颤动对心脏再同步治疗中功能性二尖瓣反流改善的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1816-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后残余二尖瓣反流的意义。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Prognostic impact of functional mitral regurgitation prior to left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术前功能性二尖瓣反流的预后影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Feb 25;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01748-9.
8
Uncorrected pre-operative mitral valve regurgitation is not associated with adverse outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.术前未纠正的二尖瓣反流与连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后的不良结局无关。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 May;34(5):718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.11.023. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
9
Prognostic comparison of atrial and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation.房室功能性二尖瓣反流的预后比较。
Open Heart. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001574.
10
Impact of left ventricular assist device implantation on mitral regurgitation: An analysis from the MOMENTUM 3 trial.左心室辅助装置植入对二尖瓣反流的影响:来自 MOMENTUM 3 试验的分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jun;39(6):529-537. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing valvular pathology during LVAD implantation.在左心室辅助装置植入期间处理瓣膜病变。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;39(Suppl 1):101-113. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01567-8. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
Pathophysiology and management of valvular disease in patients with destination left ventricular assist devices.接受左心室辅助装置植入的患者瓣膜疾病的病理生理学与管理
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1029825. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1029825. eCollection 2022.