• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模糊逻辑在地下煤矿火灾预测中的应用。

Application of Fuzzy Logic for Predicting of Mine Fire in Underground Coal Mine.

作者信息

Danish Esmatullah, Onder Mustafa

机构信息

Kabul Polytechnic University, Underground Mining Engineering Department, Karte Mamorin, 5th Districts, Kabul, Afghanistan.

Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Mining Engineering Department, Eskisehir, 26040, Turkey.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2020 Sep;11(3):322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2020.06.005
PMID:32995058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7502667/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous combustion of coal is one of the factors which causes direct or indirect gas and dust explosion, mine fire, the release of toxic gases, loss of reserve, and loss of miners' life. To avoid these incidents, the prediction of spontaneous combustion is essential. The safety of miner's in the mining field can be assured if the prediction of a coal fire is carried out at an early stage.

METHOD

Adularya Underground Coal Mine which is fully mechanized with longwall mining method was selected as a case study area. The data collected for 2017, by sensors from ten gas monitoring stations were used for the simulation and prediction of a coal fire. In this study, the fuzzy logic model is used because of the uncertainties, nonlinearity, and imprecise variables in the data. For coal fire prediction, CO, O, N, and temperature were used as input variables whereas fire intensity was considered as the output variable.The simulation of the model is carried out using the Mamdani inference system and run by the Fuzzy Logic Toolbox in MATLAB.

RESULTS

The results showed that the fuzzy logic system is more reliable in predicting fire intensity with respect to uncertainties and nonlinearities of the data. It also indicates that the 1409 and 610/2B gas station points have a greater chance of causing spontaneous combustion and therefore require a precautional measure.

CONCLUSION

The fuzzy logic model shows higher probability in predicting fire intensity with the simultaneous application of many variables compared with Graham's index.

摘要

背景

煤炭自燃是导致直接或间接瓦斯和粉尘爆炸、矿井火灾、有毒气体释放、储量损失以及矿工生命损失的因素之一。为避免这些事故,煤炭自燃预测至关重要。如果能在早期对煤炭火灾进行预测,就能确保矿区矿工的安全。

方法

选取采用长壁开采法的全机械化阿杜拉里地下煤矿作为案例研究区域。利用2017年十个气体监测站的传感器收集的数据,对煤炭火灾进行模拟和预测。在本研究中,由于数据存在不确定性、非线性和不精确变量,因此使用模糊逻辑模型。对于煤炭火灾预测,将一氧化碳(CO)、氧气(O)、氮气(N)和温度作为输入变量,而将火灾强度视为输出变量。该模型的模拟使用Mamdani推理系统,并通过MATLAB中的模糊逻辑工具箱运行。

结果

结果表明,模糊逻辑系统在考虑数据的不确定性和非线性的情况下,对火灾强度的预测更可靠。这也表明1409和610/2B气体监测站位置发生自燃的可能性更大,因此需要采取预防措施。

结论

与格雷厄姆指数相比,模糊逻辑模型在同时应用多个变量预测火灾强度方面显示出更高的概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/f3cb024024cb/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/b246e1905a22/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/428249811950/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/9e7ef3089ecb/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/6d398cdcf4b9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/af83859cb7b1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/ab5c5cc8792d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/a555af7f14b0/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/7ca7c03b990a/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/60e57aded06a/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/b33d7ad576e0/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/f3cb024024cb/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/b246e1905a22/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/428249811950/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/9e7ef3089ecb/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/6d398cdcf4b9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/af83859cb7b1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/ab5c5cc8792d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/a555af7f14b0/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/7ca7c03b990a/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/60e57aded06a/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/b33d7ad576e0/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1edf/7502667/f3cb024024cb/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of Fuzzy Logic for Predicting of Mine Fire in Underground Coal Mine.模糊逻辑在地下煤矿火灾预测中的应用。
Saf Health Work. 2020 Sep;11(3):322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Prediction of spontaneous coal combustion tendency using multinomial logistic regression.使用多项逻辑回归预测煤自燃倾向性
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2000-2009. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1944535. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey.土耳其机械化地下煤矿的模糊风险评估。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Jun;26(2):256-271. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1426804. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
4
Research Status and Development Trend of Coal Spontaneous Combustion Fire and Prevention Technology in China: A Review.中国煤炭自燃火灾及防治技术研究现状与发展趋势:综述
ACS Omega. 2024 May 9;9(20):21727-21750. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00844. eCollection 2024 May 21.
5
Risk Assessment of Miners' Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China.矿工不安全行为风险评估:以中国煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 18;16(10):1765. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101765.
6
Research on fire early warning index system of coal mine goaf based on multi-parameter fusion.基于多参数融合的煤矿采空区火灾预警指标体系研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-51089-x.
7
Tube bundle system: for monitoring of coal mine atmosphere.管束系统:用于监测煤矿井下大气环境。
Min Eng. 2013 May;65(5):57-63.
8
A visual knowledge map analysis of mine fire research based on CiteSpace.基于CiteSpace的矿井火灾研究可视化知识图谱分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(51):77609-77624. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20993-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Dynamic characteristics of near-surface spontaneous combustion gas flux and its response to meteorological and soil factors in coal fire area.煤火区近地表自燃气体通量动态特征及其对气象和土壤因素的响应
Environ Res. 2023 Jan 15;217:114817. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114817. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
Research on complex air leakage method to prevent coal spontaneous combustion in longwall goaf.研究复杂的漏风方法防止综采采空区煤炭自燃。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0213101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213101. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Fire and smoke real-time detection algorithm for coal mines based on improved YOLOv8s.基于改进 YOLOv8s 的煤矿火灾与烟雾实时检测算法。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0300502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300502. eCollection 2024.
2
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework for controlling methane explosions in coal mines.煤矿瓦斯爆炸控制的模糊多准则决策框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):9045-9061. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31782-0. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
Predictive worker safety assessment through on-site correspondence using multi-layer fuzzy logic in outdoor construction environments.
在户外建筑环境中通过使用多层模糊逻辑的现场通信进行预测性工人安全评估。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 29;9(9):e19408. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19408. eCollection 2023 Sep.