Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌筛查完成情况:按筛查方式的差异分析

Colorectal cancer screening completion: An examination of differences by screening modality.

作者信息

Finney Rutten Lila J, Jacobson Debra J, Jenkins Gregory D, Fan Chun, Weiser Emily, Parks Philip, Doroshenk Mary, Limburg Paul J, St Sauver Jennifer L

机构信息

Population Health Science Program, Robert D. and Patricia E. Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 11;20:101202. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101202. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is broadly recommended, using one of several endorsed test options. However, CRC screening participation rates remain below national goals. To gain further insights regarding recent, population-based patterns in overall and test-specific CRC screening participation, we conducted a retrospective study of adults, ages 50-75 years, utilizing comprehensive data resources from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Among residents of Olmsted County, MN eligible and due for CRC screening, we identified 5818 residents across three annual cohorts who completed screening between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. We summarized CRC screening rates as incidence per 1000 population and used Poisson regression to test for overall and mode-specific CRC trends. We also analyzed rates of follow-up colonoscopy within 6-months after a positive stool-based screening result. While no significant differences over time were observed in overall CRC screening incidence rates among those due for screening, we observed a statistically significant increase in mt-sDNA test and statistically significant decreases in screening colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT test completion rates; differences in screening overall and by modality were observed by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The diagnostic colonoscopy follow-up rate within six months after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher following mt-sDNA (84.9%) compared to FIT/FOBT (42.6%). In this retrospective, population-based study, overall CRC screening incidence rates remained stable from 2016 to 2018, while test-specific rates for mt-sDNA significantly increased and decreased for colonoscopy and FIT/FOBT. Adherence with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test was significantly higher among patients who underwent mt-sDNA screening compared to FIT/FOBT.

摘要

一般建议对平均风险的结直肠癌(CRC)进行筛查,可使用几种认可的检测方法之一。然而,CRC筛查参与率仍低于国家目标。为了进一步了解近期基于人群的总体及特定检测方法的CRC筛查参与模式,我们利用罗切斯特流行病学项目(REP)的综合数据资源,对50至75岁的成年人进行了一项回顾性研究。在明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县符合条件且应进行CRC筛查的居民中,我们确定了三个年度队列中的5818名居民,他们在2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间完成了筛查。我们将CRC筛查率总结为每1000人口中的发病率,并使用泊松回归来检验总体及特定模式的CRC趋势。我们还分析了基于粪便的筛查结果呈阳性后6个月内的后续结肠镜检查率。虽然在应筛查人群中,总体CRC筛查发病率随时间未观察到显著差异,但我们观察到mt-sDNA检测有统计学显著增加,而筛查结肠镜检查和FIT/FOBT检测完成率有统计学显著下降;总体及按检测方法的筛查差异在年龄、性别和种族/族裔方面均有观察到。基于粪便的检测结果呈阳性后6个月内,mt-sDNA检测后的诊断性结肠镜检查随访率(84.9%)显著高于FIT/FOBT检测(42.6%)。在这项基于人群的回顾性研究中,2016年至2018年总体CRC筛查发病率保持稳定,而mt-sDNA的特定检测率显著上升,结肠镜检查和FIT/FOBT的检测率则显著下降。与FIT/FOBT检测相比,接受mt-sDNA筛查的患者在基于粪便的检测结果呈阳性后进行后续结肠镜检查的依从性显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cffe/7516167/712ab42a53b0/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验