• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Review of Emergency Response Management of 33 Major Burn Victims of the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion Disaster in a Regional Hospital Without Burn Units.某无烧伤科的区域医院对33名台湾八仙尘爆重大烧伤受害者的应急响应管理回顾
J Acute Med. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):110-117. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201909_9(3).0003.
2
Beyond surge: Coping with mass burn casualty in the closest hospital to the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion.超越激增:应对福岛海滨爆炸事故中离爆炸地点最近的医院的大批烧伤伤员。
Burns. 2019 Jun;45(4):964-973. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
The role of preliminary hospitals in the management of a mass burn casualty disaster.基层医院在大规模烧伤伤员灾难管理中的作用。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
4
Management of the Formosa Color Dust Explosion: Lessons Learned from the Treatment of 49 Mass Burn Casualty Patients at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.台湾彩色粉尘爆炸事件的处理:长庚纪念医院救治49名大规模烧伤伤员的经验教训
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1900-1908. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002148.
5
Coping With a Mass Casualty: Insights into a Hospital's Emergency Response and Adaptations After the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion.应对重大伤亡事件:福容大饭店粉尘爆炸后医院的紧急应对和调整之见解。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Aug;14(4):467-476. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.69. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Goal-Directed Fluid Resuscitation Protocol Based on Arterial Waveform Analysis of Major Burn Patients in a Mass Burn Casualty.基于群体烧伤伤员中重度烧伤患者动脉波形分析的目标导向性液体复苏方案
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;80(2S Suppl 1):S21-S25. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001288.
7
Response of a local hospital to a burn disaster: Contributory factors leading to zero mortality outcomes.当地一家医院对烧伤灾难的应对:实现零死亡结果的促成因素。
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1083-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Optimizing mass casualty burns intensive care organization and treatment using evidence-based outcome predictors.利用基于证据的预后预测指标优化大规模伤亡烧伤重症监护的组织与治疗。
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1077-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
9
The Formosa Fun Coast water park dust explosion accident: Three-year cohort study to track changes and analyze the influencing factors of burn survivors' quality of life.台湾美丽华乐园水乐园粉尘爆炸事故:三年群组追踪研究以追踪变化并分析烧伤幸存者生活质量的影响因素。
Burns. 2019 Dec;45(8):1923-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
10
Cost Analysis of 48 Burn Patients in a Mass Casualty Explosion Treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.长庚纪念医院收治的48例大规模伤亡爆炸烧伤患者的成本分析。
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review.资源有限环境下严重烧伤患者初始液体管理的适应性方法:一项系统综述
Burns Open. 2024 Nov;8(4):None. doi: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100365.
2
Preparation of Medical Supply for Prehospital Emergencies and Disasters: An Internet-Based Simulation Drill.院前急救与灾难医疗物资准备:基于互联网的模拟演练
J Acute Med. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):20-35. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202303_13(1).0004.
3
Examining the Disaster Response Twenty Years After the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake.审视1999年集集地震二十年后的灾难应对情况。
J Acute Med. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):81-82. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201909_9(3).0001.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of preliminary hospitals in the management of a mass burn casualty disaster.基层医院在大规模烧伤伤员灾难管理中的作用。
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
2
Inhalation injury caused by cornstarch dust explosion in intubated patients-A single center experience.插管患者因玉米淀粉粉尘爆炸导致的吸入性损伤——单中心经验
Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
A Coordinated Emergency Response: A Color Dust Explosion at a 2015 Concert in Taiwan.一次协同应急响应:2015年台湾一场音乐会发生的彩色粉尘爆炸事件。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep;106(9):1582-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303261. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Guidelines for Burn Care Under Austere Conditions: Introduction to Burn Disaster, Airway and Ventilator Management, and Fluid Resuscitation.严峻条件下烧伤护理指南:烧伤灾难、气道与呼吸机管理及液体复苏概论
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):e427-39. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000304.
5
Management of the Formosa Color Dust Explosion: Lessons Learned from the Treatment of 49 Mass Burn Casualty Patients at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.台湾彩色粉尘爆炸事件的处理:长庚纪念医院救治49名大规模烧伤伤员的经验教训
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1900-1908. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002148.
6
More Than One Third of Intubations in Patients Transferred to Burn Centers are Unnecessary: Proposed Guidelines for Appropriate Intubation of the Burn Patient.转入烧伤中心的患者中超过三分之一的插管是不必要的:烧伤患者适当插管的拟议指南。
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):e409-14. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000288.
7
Increase in early mechanical ventilation of burn patients: an effect of current emergency trauma management?烧伤患者早期机械通气的增加:当前急诊创伤管理的影响?
J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):611-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821067aa.
8
Decompression not escharotomy in acute burns.急性烧伤时行减压而非焦痂切开术。
Burns. 2006 May;32(3):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

某无烧伤科的区域医院对33名台湾八仙尘爆重大烧伤受害者的应急响应管理回顾

Review of Emergency Response Management of 33 Major Burn Victims of the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion Disaster in a Regional Hospital Without Burn Units.

作者信息

Lin Chieh-Hung, Chen Wei-Lun, Wu Bor-Hen, Hung Tzu-Yao

机构信息

Taipei City Hospital, Zhong-Xing branch Department of Emergency Medicine Taipei Taiwan.

National Chiao Tung University Department of Biomedical Science and Technology College of Biological science and Technology.

出版信息

J Acute Med. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):110-117. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201909_9(3).0003.

DOI:10.6705/j.jacme.201909_9(3).0003
PMID:32995239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7440376/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion is one of the major national disasters in Taiwan. The Taipei City Hospital (TCH), a regional hospital without a burn unit, received 33 patients out of 499 casualties in the initial response period. This retrospective study aimed to review the primary response of TCH and the outcome and mortality of the patients who were initially managed at TCH.

METHODS

Basic profi les, total body surface area (TBSA) with burn injury, facial burn injury, vital signs, laboratory data, intubation rate and clinical outcomes, such as urine output and mortality, were analyzed. Moreover, the emergency department (ED) response faculties, who were involved in the initial response, were interviewed about the critical decision-making processes during the patient surge in the ED.

RESULTS

The average initial estimated TBSA with burn injury in ED was 34.2%, and the average final TBSA assessed in the intensive care unit was 41.0%. The patients with facial burn injury were 38.7%, and the intubation rate was 22.6%. When comparing the result of TCH to the patient group transferred directly to Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), and the group received by CGMH from other hospital, the mortality rate was 0.0, 5.7, 9.1%; and the delayed intubation rate was 3.0, 14.3, 27.3%, respectively. The key elements for effi cient initial response were the multidisciplinary response team cooperated as a production line, using the clipboards for orders recordings, and the plastic surgeons ED-operating room (OR) direct transferring.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding airway complications, and mortality, patients who were initially managed in TCH had comparable results with patients directly sent to the burn centers. This study supports the notion that immediate resuscitation in multiple level of hospitals, even without burn units but with adequate recruited response personnel, provided the best chance for the survival of casualties during such national disasters.

摘要

背景

八仙尘爆是台湾重大的全国性灾难之一。台北市立联合医院(TCH)是一家没有烧伤科的区域医院,在初期响应阶段接收了499名伤者中的33名患者。这项回顾性研究旨在回顾台北市立联合医院的初期响应情况以及在该院接受初期治疗的患者的结局和死亡率。

方法

分析患者的基本资料、烧伤的总体表面积(TBSA)、面部烧伤情况、生命体征、实验室数据、插管率以及尿量和死亡率等临床结局。此外,还对参与初期响应的急诊科(ED)响应人员就急诊科患者激增期间的关键决策过程进行了访谈。

结果

急诊科最初估计的平均烧伤TBSA为34.2%,重症监护病房评估的最终平均TBSA为41.0%。面部烧伤患者占38.7%,插管率为22.6%。将台北市立联合医院的结果与直接转至长庚纪念医院(CGMH)的患者组以及由其他医院转至长庚纪念医院的患者组进行比较,死亡率分别为0.0%、5.7%、9.1%;延迟插管率分别为3.0%、14.3%、27.3%。高效初期响应的关键要素包括多学科响应团队像生产线一样协同工作、使用写字板记录医嘱以及整形外科医生在急诊科与手术室之间直接转运患者。

结论

在气道并发症和死亡率方面,在台北市立联合医院接受初期治疗的患者与直接送至烧伤中心的患者结果相当。本研究支持这样一种观点,即在多层级医院中,即使没有烧伤科,但有足够的招募响应人员进行即时复苏,能为这类全国性灾难中的伤者提供最佳的生存机会。