• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂是否会增加死亡率?系统评价及证据深度分析。

Do proton pump inhibitors increase mortality? A systematic review and in-depth analysis of the evidence.

机构信息

Therapeutics Initiative, Drug Assessment Working Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;8(5):e00651. doi: 10.1002/prp2.651.

DOI:10.1002/prp2.651
PMID:32996701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7525804/
Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were primarily approved for short-term use (2 to 8 weeks). However, PPI use continues to expand. Widely believed to be safe, we reviewed emerging evidence on increased mortality with PPI long-term use. Our 2016 systematic PPI drug class review found that mortality was not reported as an outcome in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared different PPIs. We sought more recent and comprehensive data on PPI harm outcomes from research syntheses as a follow-on. A search was conducted from January 2014 to January 2020. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central for evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and primary studies reporting all-cause mortality in adults treated with a PPI for any indication (duration >12 weeks) compared to patients without PPI treatment (no use, placebo, or H2RA use). Two independent investigators assessed study eligibility, synthesized evidence, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Data on all-cause mortality were sought, analyzed, critically examined, and interpreted herein. From 1304 articles, one SR was identified that reported on all-cause mortality. The SRs pooled three observational studies with data to 1 year: odds ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53-1.84. A RCT, the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulant Strategies) RCT with data to 3 years: hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15. The US Veterans Affairs cohort study using a large national dataset with data to 10 years found a HR of 1.17, 95% CI (1.10-1.24) and (NNH) of 22. The most common causes of death were from cardiovascular and chronic kidney diseases, with an excess death of 15 and 4 per 1000 patients, respectively, over the 10-year period. Harms arising from real-world medication use are best evaluated using a pharmacovigilance "convergence of proof" approach using data from a variety of sources and various study designs. Given that most PPI indications for use recommended a treatment duration of less than 12 weeks, it seems clear that PPIs were significantly overused in older patients. The median exposure time to PPI ranged from 1 to 4.6 years. Signals of serious harms including increased mortality with long-term PPI use are reported in observational studies. The COMPASS trial findings are not inconsistent with contemporaneous findings from observational studies. The COMPASS RCT was unlikely to detect an increase in mortality given the trial was not powered to detect this outcome. The potential increase in mortality in older patients associated with prolonged PPI exposure needs to be conveyed to health professionals. Clinicians and patients may be able to reverse the relentless expansion of long-term PPI exposure by reviewing indications and considering potential harms as well as benefits.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0342/7525804/2a4811af86f3/PRP2-8-e00651-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0342/7525804/4ba61dc5fb40/PRP2-8-e00651-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0342/7525804/2a4811af86f3/PRP2-8-e00651-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0342/7525804/4ba61dc5fb40/PRP2-8-e00651-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0342/7525804/2a4811af86f3/PRP2-8-e00651-g002.jpg

质子泵抑制剂 (PPIs) 最初被批准用于短期使用(2 至 8 周)。然而,PPI 的使用仍在继续扩大。由于广泛认为它们是安全的,我们审查了 PPI 长期使用与死亡率增加相关的新出现的证据。我们 2016 年的质子泵抑制剂药物类别系统评价发现,随机对照试验 (RCT) 并未将死亡率作为直接比较不同 PPI 的结果进行报告。因此,我们作为后续工作,从研究综合中寻找关于 PPI 危害结果的最新和更全面的数据。从 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月进行了搜索。我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central 中搜索了系统评价 (SR) 和初级研究的证据,这些研究报告了在任何适应症(持续时间> 12 周)下接受 PPI 治疗的成年人与未接受 PPI 治疗的患者(未使用、安慰剂或 H2RA 治疗)的全因死亡率。两名独立的调查员评估了研究的合格性、综合证据,并评估了纳入研究的质量。本文旨在寻求和分析全因死亡率数据,并对其进行批判性评估和解释。从 1304 篇文章中,确定了一篇报告全因死亡率的 SR。该 SR 汇总了三项观察性研究的数据,随访时间为 1 年:比值比,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.53-1.84。一项 RCT,即 COMPASS(抗凝策略人群的心血管结局)RCT,随访时间为 3 年:风险比(HR)为 1.03,95%CI 为 0.92-1.15。一项使用大型全国数据集的美国退伍军人事务队列研究,随访时间为 10 年,发现 HR 为 1.17,95%CI(1.10-1.24)和(NNH)为 22。最常见的死亡原因是心血管疾病和慢性肾病,在 10 年期间,每 1000 名患者中分别有 15 名和 4 名患者因该疾病而过早死亡。最好使用来自各种来源和各种研究设计的数据的药物警戒“证据汇聚”方法来评估来自真实世界药物使用的危害。鉴于大多数 PPI 推荐的使用期限少于 12 周,因此 PPI 在老年患者中的使用显然过多。PPI 的中位暴露时间为 1 至 4.6 年。观察性研究报告了长期使用 PPI 会出现严重危害的信号,包括死亡率增加。COMPASS 试验的结果与同期观察性研究的结果并不矛盾。由于该试验没有检测到死亡率增加的功效,因此不太可能检测到 COMPASS RCT 中死亡率的增加。与长期 PPI 暴露相关的老年患者潜在的死亡率增加需要向医疗保健专业人员传达。临床医生和患者可以通过审查适应症并考虑潜在的危害和益处,来扭转长期 PPI 暴露的无休止扩张。

相似文献

1
Do proton pump inhibitors increase mortality? A systematic review and in-depth analysis of the evidence.质子泵抑制剂是否会增加死亡率?系统评价及证据深度分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;8(5):e00651. doi: 10.1002/prp2.651.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Inappropriate Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor Among Elderly Patients in British Columbia: What are the Long-term Adverse Events?不列颠哥伦比亚省老年人质子泵抑制剂的不适当使用:有哪些长期不良事件?
Curr Drug Saf. 2024;19(2):244-247. doi: 10.2174/1574886318666230726124540.
4
Estimates of all cause mortality and cause specific mortality associated with proton pump inhibitors among US veterans: cohort study.质子泵抑制剂与美国退伍军人全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率的相关性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1580.
5
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.
6
Interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units.重症监护病房患者上消化道出血的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD008687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008687.pub2.
7
Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults.成人慢性质子泵抑制剂的撤药与继续用药对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 16;3(3):CD011969. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011969.pub2.
8
Systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.质子泵抑制剂治疗急性上消化道出血的临床疗效及成本效益的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(51):iii-iv, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta11510.
9
Long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre-malignant lesions.长期使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与胃前驱病变的发生
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 2;2014(12):CD010623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010623.pub2.
10
Conflicting results between randomized trials and observational studies on the impact of proton pump inhibitors on cardiovascular events when coadministered with dual antiplatelet therapy: systematic review.关于质子泵抑制剂与双重抗血小板疗法合用时对心血管事件影响的随机试验和观察性研究结果相互矛盾:系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):47-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001177. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the risk of osteoporosis-related adverse events with proton pump inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study.评估质子泵抑制剂相关骨质疏松不良事件的风险:一项药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1582908. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1582908. eCollection 2025.
2
Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review, evidence synthesis and life course epidemiology perspective.质子泵抑制剂与胃癌风险:一项系统综述、证据综合及生命历程流行病学视角分析
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 19;12(1):e001719. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001719.
3
Proton pump inhibitors and all-cause mortality risk among cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理:国际共识组的指南推荐。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
Proton pump inhibitors, adverse events and increased risk of mortality.质子泵抑制剂、不良事件与死亡率升高。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;18(11):1043-1053. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1664470. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Re: American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.
质子泵抑制剂与癌症患者的全因死亡风险
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 24;16(1):99240. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i1.99240.
4
Increased risk of adenomatous colon polyps in patients with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: a single-center retrospective study.长期使用质子泵抑制剂患者患结肠腺瘤性息肉风险增加:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2025;42:24. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2025.42.24. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Prenatal and Early Childhood Exposure to Proton Pump Inhibitors and Antibiotics and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.产前及幼儿期暴露于质子泵抑制剂和抗生素与儿童癌症风险:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
Drug Saf. 2025 Apr;48(4):375-388. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01500-x. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
6
Trends in Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Sweden by Sex and Age: A Drug Utilisation Study.瑞典按性别和年龄划分的质子泵抑制剂使用趋势:一项药物利用研究。
Drug Saf. 2025 Apr;48(4):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01502-9. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
7
Proton Pump Inhibitor Usage in Urban vs. Rural Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review of Implications for Standardization of Care.城市与农村重症监护病房质子泵抑制剂的使用:关于护理标准化影响的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71446. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71446. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor-Acid Suppressive Treatment Can Cause Vitamin B Deficiency in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES) Patients.长期质子泵抑制剂抑酸治疗可导致 Zollinger-Ellison 综合征(ZES)患者维生素 B 缺乏。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 2;25(13):7286. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137286.
9
Proton pump inhibitors associated with an increased risk of mortality in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与老年人死亡风险增加相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Mar;80(3):367-382. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03606-0. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
10
Inappropriate Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor Among Elderly Patients in British Columbia: What are the Long-term Adverse Events?不列颠哥伦比亚省老年人质子泵抑制剂的不适当使用:有哪些长期不良事件?
Curr Drug Saf. 2024;19(2):244-247. doi: 10.2174/1574886318666230726124540.
关于:美国老年医学会2019年更新的《美国老年医学会老年人潜在不适当用药的Beers标准®》。
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):438. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000409. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors Based on a Large, Multi-Year, Randomized Trial of Patients Receiving Rivaroxaban or Aspirin.基于接受利伐沙班或阿司匹林的患者的大型多年随机试验的质子泵抑制剂安全性。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Sep;157(3):682-691.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Estimates of all cause mortality and cause specific mortality associated with proton pump inhibitors among US veterans: cohort study.质子泵抑制剂与美国退伍军人全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率的相关性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1580.
6
The risks of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: a critical review.长期使用质子泵抑制剂的风险:一项批判性综述。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Nov 19;10:2042098618809927. doi: 10.1177/2042098618809927. eCollection 2019.
7
Analysis of postmarketing safety data for proton-pump inhibitors reveals increased propensity for renal injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and nephrolithiasis.质子泵抑制剂上市后安全性数据分析显示其致肾损伤、电解质异常和肾结石的倾向性增加。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 19;9(1):2282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39335-7.
8
Advantages and Disadvantages of Long-term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use.长期使用质子泵抑制剂的利弊
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Apr 30;24(2):182-196. doi: 10.5056/jnm18001.
9
Effects of gastroprotectant drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.胃保护药物预防和治疗消化性溃疡病及其并发症的效果:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;3(4):231-241. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30037-2. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review.质子泵抑制剂与心血管事件:一项系统评价
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Nov 20.