Suppr超能文献

基于双参数磁共振成像的前列腺系统和靶向活检在初次活检患者中的应用。

Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Bi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biopsy-Naïve Patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Urologic Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2022 Jan;35(1):92-97. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1825884. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the performance of targeted biopsy (TB) in combination with systematic biopsy (SB) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy naïve patients.

METHODS

From May 2018 to January 2020, 230 biopsy-naïve men with suspicious bi-parametric MRI [bpMRI; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥3] were enrolled. All patients had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 20 ng/ml or less. For each patient, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was performed. The primary endpoint was the detection rate of CSPC [clinically-significant PCa, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP GG) 2 or higher tumors]. The secondary endpoints were the detection rates of CIPC (clinically insignificant PCa, ISUP GG 1 tumors).

RESULTS

CSPC was detected in 90 patients. Twelve (13.33%) of them were detected by TB only and 18 (20.00%) by SB only. Detection of CSPC by SB and TB did not differ significantly ( = .36). In 4.35% of 230 patients, CSPC would have been missed if we performed SB only, and in 6.09% of patients if we performed TB only. Moreover, combination of TB and SB did not increase the detection of CIPC.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the detection of CSPC between TB and SB; however, both techniques revealed substantial added value and combination of TB and SB could further improve this detection rate without increasing the detection of CIPC.

摘要

目的

探讨靶向活检(TB)联合系统活检(SB)在初诊前列腺癌(PCa)患者中的检测性能。

方法

本研究纳入了 2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 1 月间 230 名初诊且有可疑双参数 MRI [前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分≥3;前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平<20ng/ml]的患者。所有患者均行经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检。主要终点是 CSPC[临床显著 PCa,国际泌尿病理学会分级组(ISUP GG)2 级或更高肿瘤]的检出率。次要终点是 CIPC[临床意义不显著 PCa,ISUP GG 1 级肿瘤]的检出率。

结果

90 名患者中检测到 CSPC。其中 12 名(13.33%)仅通过 TB 检出,18 名(20.00%)仅通过 SB 检出。SB 和 TB 检测 CSPC 的结果无显著差异(=0.36)。如果仅行 SB,230 名患者中有 4.35%的患者会漏诊 CSPC,如果仅行 TB,有 6.09%的患者会漏诊 CSPC。此外,TB 和 SB 的联合并未增加 CIPC 的检出率。

结论

TB 和 SB 检测 CSPC 的结果无显著差异;然而,这两种技术都具有显著的附加价值,TB 和 SB 的联合可以进一步提高检出率,而不会增加 CIPC 的检出率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验