IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4086-4094. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01470. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Tumor testing for microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair-deficiency (MSI/IHC) and clinical prediction models effectively screen for Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), but they have not been assessed for their ability to identify non-LS forms of inherited risk. The aim of this study was to compare MSI/IHC and the PREMM prediction model to identify carriers of LS and non-LS pathogenic variants (PVs) among patients with CRC and EC.
Data were retrospectively analyzed from two single-institution cohorts: 706 patients with CRC and/or EC referred for genetic evaluation/testing (high-risk cohort) and 1,058 consecutively ascertained patients with CRC (oncology clinic cohort), unselected for familial risk. All participants underwent germline multigene panel testing. PREMM scores were calculated from personal/family cancer history. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with germline PVs (LS PVs, high-penetrance PVs, and any PVs) who had abnormal MSI/IHC testing and/or PREMM score ≥ 2.5%.
MSI/IHC and PREMM had comparable sensitivity for identifying LS carriers in high-risk (89.3% 85.7%; = .712) and oncology clinic patients (96.6% 96.6%; = 1.000), although MSI/IHC had significantly superior specificity for LS (81.3% 20.1%; < .001; 92.3% 24.3%; < .001). In both cohorts, PREMM had superior sensitivity to MSI/IHC at identifying patients with any high-penetrance PVs and any low-, moderate-, and high-penetrance PVs. Among patients with normal MSI/IHC, PREMM identified 84.2% and 83.3% of high-risk patients with CRC/EC and oncology clinic CRC patients with high-penetrance PVs, respectively.
MSI/IHC and PREMM effectively identify patients with CRC and/or EC with LS, although MSI/IHC has better specificity for LS. Because PREMM identifies non-LS, high-penetrance germline PVs, patients with CRC and/or EC with PREMM score ≥ 2.5%, including those with normal MSI/IHC, should be offered multigene panel testing.
微卫星不稳定性和/或错配修复缺陷(MSI/IHC)的肿瘤检测以及临床预测模型能够有效地筛选出林奇综合征(LS)相关的结直肠癌(CRC)和子宫内膜癌(EC),但它们在识别非 LS 形式的遗传风险方面的能力尚未得到评估。本研究旨在比较 MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 预测模型,以确定 CRC 和 EC 患者中 LS 和非 LS 致病性变异(PVs)携带者。
本研究回顾性分析了来自两个单机构队列的数据:706 例接受遗传评估/检测的 CRC 和/或 EC 患者(高危队列)和 1058 例连续确定的 CRC 患者(肿瘤诊所队列),这些患者均未选择具有家族风险。所有参与者均接受了种系多基因panel 检测。PREMM 评分根据个人/家族癌症史计算。主要结局是具有种系 PVs(LS PVs、高外显率 PVs 和任何 PVs)的个体中异常 MSI/IHC 检测和/或 PREMM 评分≥2.5%的比例。
MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 在高危(89.3% 85.7%; =.712)和肿瘤诊所患者(96.6% 96.6%; = 1.000)中识别 LS 携带者的敏感性相当,尽管 MSI/IHC 对 LS 的特异性显著更高(81.3% 20.1%; <.001;92.3% 24.3%; <.001)。在两个队列中,PREMM 在识别具有任何高外显率 PVs 和任何低、中、高外显率 PVs 的患者方面,其敏感性均优于 MSI/IHC。在 MSI/IHC 正常的患者中,PREMM 分别识别出 84.2%和 83.3%的高危 CRC/EC 患者和肿瘤诊所 CRC 患者具有高外显率 PVs。
MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 可有效识别 CRC 和/或 EC 患者的 LS,但 MSI/IHC 对 LS 的特异性更好。由于 PREMM 可识别非 LS、高外显率的种系 PVs,因此 PREMM 评分≥2.5%的 CRC 和/或 EC 患者,包括 MSI/IHC 正常的患者,均应接受多基因 panel 检测。