Suppr超能文献

比较结直肠和子宫内膜微卫星不稳定肿瘤分析以及预测多基因panel 检测中致病性种系变异的 Premm 风险评估。

Comparison of Colorectal and Endometrial Microsatellite Instability Tumor Analysis and Premm Risk Assessment for Predicting Pathogenic Germline Variants on Multigene Panel Testing.

机构信息

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4086-4094. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01470. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Tumor testing for microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair-deficiency (MSI/IHC) and clinical prediction models effectively screen for Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), but they have not been assessed for their ability to identify non-LS forms of inherited risk. The aim of this study was to compare MSI/IHC and the PREMM prediction model to identify carriers of LS and non-LS pathogenic variants (PVs) among patients with CRC and EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively analyzed from two single-institution cohorts: 706 patients with CRC and/or EC referred for genetic evaluation/testing (high-risk cohort) and 1,058 consecutively ascertained patients with CRC (oncology clinic cohort), unselected for familial risk. All participants underwent germline multigene panel testing. PREMM scores were calculated from personal/family cancer history. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with germline PVs (LS PVs, high-penetrance PVs, and any PVs) who had abnormal MSI/IHC testing and/or PREMM score ≥ 2.5%.

RESULTS

MSI/IHC and PREMM had comparable sensitivity for identifying LS carriers in high-risk (89.3% 85.7%; = .712) and oncology clinic patients (96.6% 96.6%; = 1.000), although MSI/IHC had significantly superior specificity for LS (81.3% 20.1%; < .001; 92.3% 24.3%; < .001). In both cohorts, PREMM had superior sensitivity to MSI/IHC at identifying patients with any high-penetrance PVs and any low-, moderate-, and high-penetrance PVs. Among patients with normal MSI/IHC, PREMM identified 84.2% and 83.3% of high-risk patients with CRC/EC and oncology clinic CRC patients with high-penetrance PVs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MSI/IHC and PREMM effectively identify patients with CRC and/or EC with LS, although MSI/IHC has better specificity for LS. Because PREMM identifies non-LS, high-penetrance germline PVs, patients with CRC and/or EC with PREMM score ≥ 2.5%, including those with normal MSI/IHC, should be offered multigene panel testing.

摘要

目的

微卫星不稳定性和/或错配修复缺陷(MSI/IHC)的肿瘤检测以及临床预测模型能够有效地筛选出林奇综合征(LS)相关的结直肠癌(CRC)和子宫内膜癌(EC),但它们在识别非 LS 形式的遗传风险方面的能力尚未得到评估。本研究旨在比较 MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 预测模型,以确定 CRC 和 EC 患者中 LS 和非 LS 致病性变异(PVs)携带者。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了来自两个单机构队列的数据:706 例接受遗传评估/检测的 CRC 和/或 EC 患者(高危队列)和 1058 例连续确定的 CRC 患者(肿瘤诊所队列),这些患者均未选择具有家族风险。所有参与者均接受了种系多基因panel 检测。PREMM 评分根据个人/家族癌症史计算。主要结局是具有种系 PVs(LS PVs、高外显率 PVs 和任何 PVs)的个体中异常 MSI/IHC 检测和/或 PREMM 评分≥2.5%的比例。

结果

MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 在高危(89.3% 85.7%; =.712)和肿瘤诊所患者(96.6% 96.6%; = 1.000)中识别 LS 携带者的敏感性相当,尽管 MSI/IHC 对 LS 的特异性显著更高(81.3% 20.1%; <.001;92.3% 24.3%; <.001)。在两个队列中,PREMM 在识别具有任何高外显率 PVs 和任何低、中、高外显率 PVs 的患者方面,其敏感性均优于 MSI/IHC。在 MSI/IHC 正常的患者中,PREMM 分别识别出 84.2%和 83.3%的高危 CRC/EC 患者和肿瘤诊所 CRC 患者具有高外显率 PVs。

结论

MSI/IHC 和 PREMM 可有效识别 CRC 和/或 EC 患者的 LS,但 MSI/IHC 对 LS 的特异性更好。由于 PREMM 可识别非 LS、高外显率的种系 PVs,因此 PREMM 评分≥2.5%的 CRC 和/或 EC 患者,包括 MSI/IHC 正常的患者,均应接受多基因 panel 检测。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Cancer Susceptibility Mutations in Patients With Urothelial Malignancies.膀胱癌患者的癌症易感性突变。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):406-414. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01395. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验