Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Safety and Bioethics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Infectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2021 Jan;37(1):4-10. doi: 10.1089/AID.2020.0078. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
International guidelines recommend the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INI)-based regimens as first-line antiretroviral (ARV) in both naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. We analyzed a multicenter cohort of HIV-infected patients, both naive and experienced, starting an ARV, including an INI. Chi-square test and nonparametric tests were used to assess differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the probability of maintaining the study drug and Cox-regression analysis to evaluate predictors of discontinuation. We enrolled 4,343 patients: 3,143 (72.4%) were males, with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range 41-55). Naive patients were 733 (16.9%), of whom 168 (22.9%) were AIDS presenters. Overall, 2,282 patients (52.5%) started dolutegravir (DTG), 1,426 (32.8%) raltegravir (RAL), and 635 (14.7%) elvitegravir (EVG). During 10,032 patient years of follow-up (PYFU), we observed 1,278 discontinuations (13 per 100 PYFU); 448 of them (35%) due to simplification and 355 (28%) to toxicities (98 for central nervous system toxicity). Reasons of discontinuation were different between INIs. Estimated probability of maintaining DTG at 3 and 4 years were 81.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80.5-82.5] and 76.3% (95% CI: 73.9-78.7), respectively; RAL 61.6% (95% CI: 60.2-63.0) and 54.1% (95% CI: 52.7-55.5); EVG 71.6% (95% CI: 69.2-74.0) and 68.3% (95% CI: 65.3-71.3) ( < .001). At a multivariable analysis, being on a RAL-based ARV [vs. DTG, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.9, 95% CI: 2.3-3.6, < .001], a EVG-based ARV (vs. DTG, aHR 1.3 95% CI: 1.1-1.7, = .049), and a peak HIV-RNA >500k cp/mL (aHR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6, = .006) predicted INI discontinuation. Our data confirm the good tolerability of INIs in clinical practice. Differences emerge between the three drugs in reasons for discontinuation.
国际指南建议在初治和经验丰富的 HIV 感染者中使用整合酶抑制剂(INI)为基础的方案作为一线抗逆转录病毒(ARV)。我们分析了一个多中心的 HIV 感染者队列,包括初治和经验丰富的患者,开始使用包括 INI 的 ARV。卡方检验和非参数检验分别用于评估分类和连续变量的差异。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析用于估计维持研究药物的概率,Cox 回归分析用于评估停药的预测因素。我们共纳入了 4343 名患者:3143 名(72.4%)为男性,中位年龄为 49 岁(四分位距 41-55)。初治患者为 733 名(16.9%),其中 168 名(22.9%)为艾滋病患者。总体而言,2282 名患者(52.5%)开始使用多替拉韦(DTG),1426 名(32.8%)使用拉替拉韦(RAL),635 名(14.7%)使用艾维雷韦(EVG)。在 10032 患者年的随访期间(PYFU),我们观察到 1278 例停药(每 100PYFU 中有 13 例);其中 448 例(35%)是由于简化方案,355 例(28%)是由于毒性(98 例为中枢神经系统毒性)。不同 INI 停药的原因也不同。估计 DTG 在 3 年和 4 年时的维持概率分别为 81.5%[95%可信区间(CI):80.5-82.5]和 76.3%(95% CI:73.9-78.7);RAL 为 61.6%(95% CI:60.2-63.0)和 54.1%(95% CI:52.7-55.5);EVG 为 71.6%(95% CI:69.2-74.0)和 68.3%(95% CI:65.3-71.3)( < .001)。在多变量分析中,基于 RAL 的 ARV[与 DTG 相比,调整后的危险比(aHR)为 2.9,95% CI:2.3-3.6, < .001]、基于 EVG 的 ARV(与 DTG 相比,aHR 为 1.3,95% CI:1.1-1.7, = .049)和 HIV-RNA 峰值>500k cp/mL(aHR 为 1.3,95% CI:1.1-1.6, = .006)预测 INI 停药。我们的数据证实了 INI 在临床实践中的良好耐受性。三种药物在停药原因上存在差异。