Spinal Rehabilitation Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rehabilitation and Aged Services Program, Department of Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020 Sep 30;6(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00339-5.
Intermittent catheterization (IMC) is the accepted evidence-based best practice for bladder management in people with voiding dysfunction due to neurogenic bladder. The two methods for performing IMC over the decades since this practice was introduced are reuse and single-use catheters. There are perceived advantages and disadvantages of each method of performing IMC. There is considerable evidence that single-use IMC is associated with better health outcomes, including reduced risk of urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, and quality of life. People performing IMC also indicate a preference for single-use, although there are advantages of reuse that need to be acknowledged. Ideally, further research is needed in this area, particularly around the washing and storage of reuse catheters, as well as an adequately powered multicenter RCT comparing reuse with single-use IMC, but there are numerous challenges associated with progressing this research.
间歇性导尿(IC)是目前公认的神经源性膀胱排尿功能障碍患者膀胱管理的循证最佳实践。自该实践引入以来的几十年中,进行 IMC 的两种方法是重复使用和一次性使用导尿管。每种 IMC 方法都有其优点和缺点。有大量证据表明,一次性 IMC 与更好的健康结果相关,包括降低尿路感染、尿道创伤和生活质量的风险。进行 IMC 的人也表示更喜欢一次性使用,尽管重复使用也有其优势需要被认可。理想情况下,需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究,特别是围绕重复使用导尿管的清洗和储存,以及一项比较重复使用与一次性 IMC 的多中心 RCT,但是推进这项研究存在许多挑战。