文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

比较基于光电容积脉搏波和基于标准袖带的测压设备的血压测量值。

Comparing blood pressure measurements between a photoplethysmography-based and a standard cuff-based manometry device.

机构信息

Institute for Research in Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Israel Defense Force Medical Corps, POB 12272, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.

Heart Institute, Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 30;10(1):16116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73172-3.


DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-73172-3
PMID:32999400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7527983/
Abstract

Repeated blood pressure (BP) measurements allow better control of hypertension. Current measurements rely on cuff-based devices. The aim of the present study was to compare BP measurements using a novel cuff-less photoplethysmography-based device to a standard sphygmomanometer device. Males and females were recruited from within the general population who arrived at a public BP screening station. One to two measurements were taken from each using a sphygmomanometer-based and the photoplethysmography-based devices. Devices were considered equal if the mean difference between paired measurements was below 5 mmHg and the Standard Deviation (SD) was no greater than 8 mmHg. Agreement and reliability analyses were also performed. 1057 subjects were included in the study analysis. There were no adverse events during the study. The mean (± SD) difference between paired measurements for all subjects was -0.1 ± 3.6 mmHg for the systolic and 0.0 ± 3.5 mmHg for the diastolic readings. We found 96.31% agreement in identifying hypertension and an Interclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.99 and 0.97 for systolic and diastolic measurements, respectively. The photoplethysmography-based device was found similar to the gold-standard sphygmomanometer-based device with high agreement and reliability levels. The device might enable a reliable, more convenient method for repeated BP monitoring.

摘要

重复测量血压(BP)可更好地控制高血压。目前的测量依赖于基于袖带的设备。本研究旨在比较基于无袖带光电容积脉搏波法的新型设备与标准血压计设备的血压测量值。在公共血压筛查站,从一般人群中招募男性和女性。使用基于血压计和基于光电容积脉搏波法的设备对每个人进行一到两次测量。如果配对测量的平均差值低于 5mmHg,且标准差(SD)不超过 8mmHg,则认为设备相等。还进行了一致性和可靠性分析。该研究共纳入 1057 名受试者。研究期间无不良事件发生。所有受试者的配对测量差值的平均值(±SD)为收缩压-0.1±3.6mmHg,舒张压 0.0±3.5mmHg。我们发现,在识别高血压方面,该设备与金标准的基于血压计的设备具有 96.31%的一致性,收缩压和舒张压的组内相关系数分别为 0.99 和 0.97。该光电容积脉搏波法设备与金标准的基于血压计的设备具有高度一致性和可靠性,可能为重复监测血压提供一种可靠、更方便的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/5bc0f42a434d/41598_2020_73172_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/68d8d1831632/41598_2020_73172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/4eedef9bf42d/41598_2020_73172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/44be71596cf5/41598_2020_73172_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/1e92918766ec/41598_2020_73172_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/5cf613c08ec6/41598_2020_73172_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/5bc0f42a434d/41598_2020_73172_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/68d8d1831632/41598_2020_73172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/4eedef9bf42d/41598_2020_73172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/44be71596cf5/41598_2020_73172_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/1e92918766ec/41598_2020_73172_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/5cf613c08ec6/41598_2020_73172_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/7527983/5bc0f42a434d/41598_2020_73172_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparing blood pressure measurements between a photoplethysmography-based and a standard cuff-based manometry device.

Sci Rep. 2020-9-30

[2]
Comparison of cuff-based and cuffless continuous blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents.

Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020-1-15

[3]
Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.

Panminerva Med. 1999-6

[4]
Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.

Blood Press Monit. 2015-2

[5]
Validation of the Withings BPM Core Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in General Population According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023

[6]
Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.

Blood Press Monit. 2011-10

[7]
Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.

Natl Health Stat Report. 2012-10-5

[8]
Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.

J Bras Nefrol. 2012-3

[9]
Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.

Am J Hypertens. 2006-4

[10]
Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device.

Blood Press. 2023-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Speckle contrast optical spectroscopy for cuffless blood pressure estimation based on microvascular blood flow and volume oscillations.

Biomed Opt Express. 2025-7-2

[2]
Wearable Technology in Cardiology: Advancements, Applications, and Future Prospects.

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025-6-27

[3]
Selecting Wearable Devices to Measure Cardiovascular Functions in Community-Dwelling Adults: Application of a Practical Guide for Device Selection.

Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025-3-12

[4]
Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement: Where Do We Actually Stand?

Hypertension. 2025-6

[5]
Biobeat monitor utilization in various healthcare settings: A systematic review.

Digit Health. 2025-2-26

[6]
Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitor for Home and Hospital Use.

Sensors (Basel). 2025-1-22

[7]
Clinical validation of a wearable ultrasound sensor of blood pressure.

Nat Biomed Eng. 2024-11-20

[8]
A prototype photoplethysmography-based cuffless device shows promising results in tracking changes in blood pressure.

Front Med Technol. 2024-10-21

[9]
Noninvasive biometric monitoring technologies for patients with heart failure.

Heart Fail Rev. 2024-10-22

[10]
Raw Photoplethysmography as an Enhancement for Research-Grade Wearable Activity Monitors.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-9-27

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effect of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes.

N Engl J Med. 2019-7-18

[2]
Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

JAMA Intern Med. 2019-3-1

[3]
Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension in the 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines and in the Real World.

JAMA. 2018-1-9

[4]
The New 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines "Up the Pressure" on Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension.

JAMA. 2017-12-5

[5]
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults.

JAMA. 2017-12-5

[6]
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018-5-15

[7]
Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Circulation. 2017-11-13

[8]
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Hypertension. 2018-6

[9]
Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States.

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017-9

[10]
Accuracy-Limiting Factor of Home Blood Pressure Monitors?

Am J Hypertens. 2017-7-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索