Turner-Bowker Diane M, An Haack Kristina, Krohe Meaghan, Yaworsky Andrew, Vivas Norma, Kelly Masami, Chatterjee Godhuli, Chaston Emily, Mann Erin, Reaney Matthew
Adelphi Values, 290 Congress Street, 7th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Sanofi, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91380, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;4(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00246-1.
Evolving regulatory guidelines recommend routine assessment of the acceptability of pediatric oral medicines throughout clinical development processes. However, such assessment is problematic owing to a lack of standard methods or criteria that define acceptability for children and their caregivers. This research aimed to identify the attributes of acceptability for targeted oral formulation types that are important to children, and to develop content-valid patient- and caregiver-reported outcome acceptability measures for use in the context of clinical drug development.
A concept-focused literature review and two advisory panel meetings involving researchers, clinicians, and measurement scientists were conducted to identify acceptability attributes that may be relevant to children taking targeted oral medicine formulations. The Pediatric Oral Medicines Acceptability Questionnaires (P-OMAQs), including patient (P-OMAQ-P) and caregiver (P-OMAQ-C) versions, were drafted to assess these attributes. Qualitative concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) patient and caregiver interviews were conducted to confirm key acceptability attribute concepts for measurement and to evaluate patient and caregiver ability to understand and respond to the questions.
A full-text review of 40 articles identified 24 acceptability attributes that were categorized into 10 overarching domains and organized into a preliminary conceptual model. Feedback from the advisory panel refined the preliminary model. In total, 14 attributes were reported during the CE phase of the interviews (n = 23 pediatric patients, n = 13 caregivers); six attributes were included in the final model. The draft P-OMAQ was refined over four waves of CD interviews (n = 31 pediatric patients, n = 48 caregivers). The final version of the P-OMAQ-P is a 12-item questionnaire designed for young people aged 8-17 years. The P-OMAQ-C is a 19-item questionnaire designed for adult caregivers of young people aged 6 months to 17 years. There are two versions of each questionnaire: one with a 24-h recall period and one with a 7-day recall period. All items are answered on a 5-point numerical rating scale.
This research supports the content validity of the patient and caregiver versions of the P-OMAQ. Both questionnaires appropriately assess the acceptability of oral medicine formulations from the perspective of pediatric patients and their caregivers.
不断发展的监管指南建议在整个临床开发过程中对儿科口服药物的可接受性进行常规评估。然而,由于缺乏定义儿童及其照料者可接受性的标准方法或标准,这种评估存在问题。本研究旨在确定对儿童重要的靶向口服制剂类型的可接受性属性,并开发用于临床药物开发的内容有效的患者和照料者报告的结局可接受性测量方法。
进行了一项以概念为重点的文献综述以及两次咨询小组会议,参与人员包括研究人员、临床医生和测量科学家,以确定可能与服用靶向口服药物制剂的儿童相关的可接受性属性。起草了儿科口服药物可接受性问卷(P-OMAQs),包括患者版(P-OMAQ-P)和照料者版(P-OMAQ-C),以评估这些属性。进行了定性概念引出(CE)和认知反馈(CD)患者及照料者访谈,以确认用于测量的关键可接受性属性概念,并评估患者和照料者理解和回答问题的能力。
对40篇文章的全文回顾确定了24个可接受性属性,这些属性被归类为10个总体领域,并组织成一个初步概念模型。咨询小组的反馈完善了初步模型。在访谈的CE阶段,共报告了14个属性(n = 23名儿科患者,n = 13名照料者);最终模型纳入了6个属性。P-OMAQ草案在四轮CD访谈(n = 31名儿科患者,n = 48名照料者)中得到完善。P-OMAQ-P的最终版本是一份针对8至17岁青少年的12项问卷。P-OMAQ-C是一份针对6个月至17岁青少年的成年照料者的19项问卷。每份问卷有两个版本:一个有24小时回忆期版本,一个有7天回忆期版本。所有项目均采用5分数字评分量表回答。
本研究支持P-OMAQ患者版和照料者版的内容效度。两份问卷均从儿科患者及其照料者的角度适当评估了口服药物制剂的可接受性。