• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较肘部三联征损伤固定术式的手术技术:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow: A Meta-Analysis.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):328-332. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200923-04. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20200923-04
PMID:33002185
Abstract

Treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow remains a difficult problem. There are several ways to treat the radial head and coronoid fractures; controversy still exists regarding the best way to treat each. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of radial head and coronoid fractures treated using current protocols. No differences in functional outcomes were found between the different surgical techniques. There is no superior current protocol for treating these injuries. Surgical treatment should be dictated by fracture type and surgeon experience. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):328-332.].

摘要

治疗肘部严重三联征损伤仍然是一个难题。有几种方法可以治疗桡骨头和冠状突骨折;对于每种骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较目前方案治疗桡骨头和冠状突骨折的临床结果。不同手术技术之间在功能结果方面没有差异。目前没有治疗这些损伤的优越方案。手术治疗应根据骨折类型和外科医生的经验来决定。[骨科。2020;43(6):328-332.]。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow: A Meta-Analysis.比较肘部三联征损伤固定术式的手术技术:一项荟萃分析。
Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):328-332. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200923-04. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?肘部三联征损伤:是否需要固定喙突?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7.
3
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?桡骨头固定与置换治疗三联征:肘关节稳定性和预后是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.
4
Current treatment concepts for "terrible triad" injuries of the elbow.肘关节“恐怖三联征”损伤的当前治疗理念。
Orthopedics. 2014 Dec;37(12):831-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-06.
5
Case Series of All-Arthroscopic Treatment for Terrible Triad of the Elbow: Indications and Clinical Outcomes.肘关节恐怖三联征全关节镜治疗的病例系列:适应证和临床结果。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries can be safely treated without fixation.冠状突尖端骨折在三联征损伤中可以安全地不固定治疗。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5055-5064. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04889-9. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation with triceps and flexor-pronator mass avulsion.伴有肱三头肌和屈肌-旋前圆肌撕脱的肘关节恐怖三联征骨折脱位。
Orthopedics. 2015 Feb;38(2):e143-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150204-91.
8
Current concepts in the management of "Terrible Triad" injuries of the elbow.当前肘“可怕三联征”损伤处理的理念。
Injury. 2023 Aug;54(8):110889. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110889. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
9
Fixation of the coronoid process in elbow fracture-dislocations.肘部骨折脱位中喙突的固定。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1873-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01673.
10
Terrible triad injury of the elbow: current concepts.肘部恐怖三联征损伤:当前概念
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Mar;17(3):137-51. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200903000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.通过前入路行冠突优先修复治疗肘恐怖三联征损伤:一项最少 2 年随访的前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Nov 21;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z.
2
Terrible triad injuries are no longer terrible! Functional outcomes of terrible triad injuries: a scoping review.恐怖三联征损伤不再可怕!恐怖三联征损伤的功能结局:一项范围综述。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Feb 12;2(2):214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.01.002. eCollection 2022 May.