Suppr超能文献

比较肘部三联征损伤固定术式的手术技术:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow: A Meta-Analysis.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):328-332. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200923-04. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

Treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow remains a difficult problem. There are several ways to treat the radial head and coronoid fractures; controversy still exists regarding the best way to treat each. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of radial head and coronoid fractures treated using current protocols. No differences in functional outcomes were found between the different surgical techniques. There is no superior current protocol for treating these injuries. Surgical treatment should be dictated by fracture type and surgeon experience. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):328-332.].

摘要

治疗肘部严重三联征损伤仍然是一个难题。有几种方法可以治疗桡骨头和冠状突骨折;对于每种骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较目前方案治疗桡骨头和冠状突骨折的临床结果。不同手术技术之间在功能结果方面没有差异。目前没有治疗这些损伤的优越方案。手术治疗应根据骨折类型和外科医生的经验来决定。[骨科。2020;43(6):328-332.]。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验