Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;123(1):187-195. doi: 10.1002/jso.26239. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC.
Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000-2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0-1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS).
A total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p < .001) per patient and required more reoperations (22% vs. 11%; p = .007) and readmissions (39% vs. 25%; p = .014) than non-LR patients. LR patients had decreased OS (2-year OS 62% vs. 79%, p < .001), even when accounting for peritoneal carcinomatosis index and histology type. Preoperative factors associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis in LR patients included age < 60 years (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.10-11.81), colorectal histology (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.69-12.65), and multiple liver tumors (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.21-9.85) (all p < .05). When assigning one point for each factor, there was an incremental decrease in 2-year survival as the risk score increased from 0 to 3 (0: 100%; 1: 91%; 2: 58%; 3: 0%).
As CRS/HIPEC + LR has become more common, we created a simple risk score to stratify patients considered for CRS/HIPEC + LR. These data aid in striking the balance between an increased perioperative complication profile with the potential for improvement in OS.
虽然实质性肝转移以前被认为是细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)的禁忌症,但随着 CRS/HIPEC 的应用,越来越多的患者接受肝切除术(LR)。
纳入美国 HIPEC 协作组(2000-2017 年)中接受原发性、根治性 CRS/HIPEC 治疗、CC0-1 切除术的侵袭性阑尾或结直肠腺癌患者。LR 定义为正式的实质切除术。主要终点为术后并发症和总生存期(OS)。
共纳入 658 例患者。约 83 例(15%)患者接受了结直肠(58%)或侵袭性阑尾(42%)转移灶的 LR。LR 患者的并发症更多(81% vs. 60%;p = .001),每位患者的并发症数量更多(2.3 vs. 1.5;p < .001),需要更多的再次手术(22% vs. 11%;p = .007)和再次入院(39% vs. 25%;p = .014)。LR 患者的 OS 降低(2 年 OS 为 62% vs. 79%,p < .001),即使考虑到腹膜肿瘤指数和组织学类型也是如此。LR 患者多变量分析中与 OS 降低相关的术前因素包括年龄<60 岁(HR,3.61;95%CI,1.10-11.81)、结直肠组织学(HR,3.84;95%CI,1.69-12.65)和多个肝肿瘤(HR,3.45;95%CI,1.21-9.85)(均 p < .05)。当每个因素赋值 1 分时,随着风险评分从 0 增加到 3,2 年生存率呈逐渐下降趋势(0:100%;1:91%;2:58%;3:0%)。
随着 CRS/HIPEC+LR 的应用越来越普遍,我们创建了一个简单的风险评分来分层考虑接受 CRS/HIPEC+LR 的患者。这些数据有助于在增加围手术期并发症发生率和提高 OS 之间取得平衡。