N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospect 47, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Dec 7;59(50):22296-22305. doi: 10.1002/anie.202003082. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
In this Essay, we present a critical analysis of two common practices in modern chemistry-that is, of using speculations about the "greenness" and "nontoxicity" of developed synthesis procedures and of a priori labelling various compounds derived from natural sources as being environmentally safe. We note that every organic molecule that contains functional groups should be biologically active. Thus, analysis of the particular greenness and the potential environmental impact of a given chemical process should account for the biological activity of all its components in a measureable (rather than empirical) way. We highlight the necessity of clarifying discussions on biological activity and toxicity and propose possible ways of introducing tox-Profiles as a reliable overview of the overall toxicity of chemical reactions.
在这篇文章中,我们对现代化学中的两种常见做法进行了批判性分析,即使用关于已开发合成程序的“绿色”和“无毒”的推测,以及对源自天然来源的各种化合物进行先验标记为环境安全。我们注意到,每个含有官能团的有机分子都应该具有生物活性。因此,对给定化学过程的特定绿色性和潜在环境影响的分析应该以可衡量的(而不是经验的)方式考虑其所有成分的生物活性。我们强调有必要澄清关于生物活性和毒性的讨论,并提出引入 tox-Profiles 的可能方法,作为化学反应总体毒性的可靠概述。