• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平与氢氯噻嗪治疗系统性高血压的比较。

Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertension.

作者信息

Giles T D, Sander G E, Roffidal L C, Thomas M G, Given M B, Quiroz A C

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jul 1;60(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90994-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(87)90994-5
PMID:3300241
Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy with associated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction is frequently found in patients with systemic hypertension, and is multifactorial in origin. Although a reduction in blood pressure (BP) often results in regression of hypertrophy, the pharmacologic profiles of the antihypertensive agents used may determine the probability of such regression despite similar levels of BP reduction. Thiazide diuretic drugs may actually result in increased LV hypertrophy; calcium channel antagonists may cause regression or no change. The effects of treatment with nitrendipine (20 mg/day) or hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/day) were compared in an 8-week, double-blind study of 18 hypertensive subjects aged 50 years or older. BP was significantly reduced (p less than 0.05) by both nitrendipine (from 161 +/- 29/102 +/- 4 to 145 +/- 24/92 +/- 7 mm Hg; mean +/- standard deviation) and hydrochlorothiazide (from 162 +/- 15/105 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 20/95 +/- 7 mm Hg). Plasma norepinephrine increased in the nitrendipine group, from 202 +/- 110 to 332 +/- 220 pg/ml at 8 weeks of therapy and in the hydrochlorothiazide group, from 147 +/- 130 to 313 +/- 277. Plasma renin activity changed from 3.2 +/- 2.4 to 3.5 +/- 2.1 during nitrendipine treatment, but from 2.1 +/- 2.1 to 10.5 +/- 10.8 ng angiotensin l/ml/90 min (p less than 0.05) during treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Left ventricular mass index did not change significantly with either therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

左心室(LV)肥厚伴左心室收缩和舒张功能障碍常见于系统性高血压患者,其病因是多因素的。尽管血压(BP)降低通常会使肥厚消退,但所用抗高血压药物的药理学特性可能决定了在血压降低水平相似的情况下这种消退的可能性。噻嗪类利尿药实际上可能导致左心室肥厚增加;钙通道拮抗剂可能导致肥厚消退或无变化。在一项针对18名50岁及以上高血压受试者的为期8周的双盲研究中,比较了尼群地平(20毫克/天)或氢氯噻嗪(50毫克/天)治疗的效果。尼群地平(从161±29/102±4降至145±24/92±7毫米汞柱;平均值±标准差)和氢氯噻嗪(从162±15/105±6降至143±20/95±7毫米汞柱)均使血压显著降低(p<0.05)。尼群地平组血浆去甲肾上腺素在治疗8周时从202±110增加到332±220皮克/毫升,氢氯噻嗪组从147±130增加到313±277。尼群地平治疗期间血浆肾素活性从3.2±2.4变为3.5±2.1,但氢氯噻嗪治疗期间从2.1±2.1变为10.5±10.8纳克血管紧张素I/毫升/90分钟(p<0.05)。两种治疗方法下左心室质量指数均无显著变化。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertension.硝苯地平与氢氯噻嗪治疗系统性高血压的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jul 1;60(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90994-5.
2
Effects of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide on postprandial blood pressure reduction and carbohydrate metabolism in hypertensive patients over 70 years of age.尼群地平和氢氯噻嗪对70岁以上高血压患者餐后血压降低及碳水化合物代谢的影响。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 4:S59-63. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198806124-00011.
3
Nitrendipine versus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients over 70 years of age.尼群地平与氢氯噻嗪治疗70岁以上高血压患者的疗效比较
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Mar;45(3):291-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1989.31.
4
Comparison of effects of nitrendipine versus hydrochlorothiazide on left ventricular structure and function and neurohumoral status in systemic hypertension.硝苯地平与氢氯噻嗪对系统性高血压患者左心室结构和功能及神经体液状态影响的比较
Am J Cardiol. 1990 May 15;65(18):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90987-c.
5
Antihypertensive therapy with nitrendipine: comparison with hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol.尼群地平的抗高血压治疗:与氢氯噻嗪和普萘洛尔的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 4:S55-8.
6
Regression of cardiovascular structural changes after long-term antihypertensive treatment with the calcium antagonist nitrendipine.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18 Suppl 5:S5-9.
7
Hydrochlorothiazide is superior to isradipine for reduction of left ventricular mass: results of a multicenter trial. The Isradipine Study Group.氢氯噻嗪在减轻左心室质量方面优于伊拉地平:一项多中心试验的结果。伊拉地平研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1802-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00311-2.
8
Randomised, double blind, multicentre comparison of hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, nitrendipine, and enalapril in antihypertensive treatment: results of the HANE study. HANE Trial Research Group.氢氯噻嗪、阿替洛尔、尼群地平和依那普利在抗高血压治疗中的随机、双盲、多中心比较:HANE研究结果。HANE试验研究组
BMJ. 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):154-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7101.154.
9
Comparison and additivity of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide in systemic hypertension.尼群地平和氢氯噻嗪在系统性高血压治疗中的比较及相加作用
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Sep 30;58(8):16D-19D. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90418-2.
10
Effect of the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine on left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂尼群地平对高血压患者左心室质量的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986 Dec;40(6):679-85. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: Evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopause.联合运动训练对氢氯噻嗪有额外益处:高血压和绝经后模型中自主神经控制和氧化应激改善的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 7;18(8):e0289715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289715. eCollection 2023.
2
Sex Differences in the Anti-Hypertensive Effect of Calcium-Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.钙通道阻滞剂降压作用的性别差异:系统评价与荟萃分析
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 2;11(6):1622. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061622.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of isradipine SRO in the treatment of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
伊拉地平缓释片治疗高血压左心室肥厚患者的疗效评估。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994 Feb;8(1):153-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00877104.
4
Electrophysiological impact of diuretics in heart failure.利尿剂对心力衰竭的电生理影响。
Br Heart J. 1994 Aug;72(2 Suppl):S54-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.2_suppl.s54.
5
Does a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality?左心室肥厚的减轻是否能降低心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率?
Drugs. 1992;44 Suppl 1:141-6. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00027.