Laboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Laboratorio de Plasticidad Cortical y Aprendizaje Perceptual, Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Brain Res. 2020 Dec 15;1749:147138. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147138. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Psychophysics describes how variations in stimulus strength lead to changes in perceptual performance. Yet, the contribution of non-sensory information processing to perceptual decision making is still not fully understood. For instance, in two-alternative forced-choice tasks, observers can exhibit tendencies to choose more one alternative over another, with no apparent goal or function. Such choice biases are highly prevalent in mice and, in free-choice tasks, they are insensitive to changes in stimulus discriminability. Thus, a reasonable proposal is that these side-choice biases could derive from functional asymmetries in sensory processing, decision making, or both. Here, we explored how different circuits participate in the production of choice biases in adult mice. We found that the magnitude of the changes in biased choice behavior depended on the inactivated region. Indeed, contralateral, but not ipsilateral, inactivations of the primary visual and posterior parietal cortices reduced the probability of mice choosing their preferred side. In contrast, ipsilateral inactivations of the subtantia nigra pars reticulata and of the frontal orienting fields, reduced and increased the probabilities of mice choosing their preferred side, respectively. These results demonstrate that internal circuit processing contributes to side-choice behavior and illustrates how distinct brain regions could participate in producing normal to aberrant levels of choice variability.
心理物理学描述了刺激强度的变化如何导致感知表现的变化。然而,非感觉信息处理对感知决策的贡献仍不完全清楚。例如,在二选一强制选择任务中,观察者可以表现出选择一个选项而不是另一个选项的倾向,而没有明显的目标或功能。这种选择偏差在老鼠中非常普遍,并且在自由选择任务中,它们对刺激可辨别性的变化不敏感。因此,一个合理的假设是,这些侧选择偏差可能源自感觉处理、决策或两者的功能不对称。在这里,我们探讨了不同的电路如何参与成年老鼠产生选择偏差。我们发现,有偏差的选择行为变化的幅度取决于失活的区域。事实上,与对侧而非同侧失活初级视觉和后顶叶皮层,降低了老鼠选择它们喜欢的一侧的概率。相比之下,黑质网状部和额定向场的同侧失活,分别降低和增加了老鼠选择它们喜欢的一侧的概率。这些结果表明,内部电路处理有助于侧选择行为,并说明了不同的大脑区域如何参与产生正常到异常水平的选择变异性。