• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宁可事先谨慎有余,莫要事后追悔莫及:精神病理学普遍易感性的一个共同特征。

Better Safe Than Sorry: A Common Signature of General Vulnerability for Psychopathology.

作者信息

Van den Bergh Omer, Brosschot Jos, Critchley Hugo, Thayer Julian F, Ottaviani Cristina

机构信息

Health Psychology, University of Leuven.

Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):225-246. doi: 10.1177/1745691620950690. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1177/1745691620950690
PMID:33006909
Abstract

Several labels, such as neuroticism, negative emotionality, and dispositional negativity, indicate a broad dimension of psychopathology. However, largely separate, often disorder-specific research lines have developed that focus on different cognitive and affective characteristics that are associated with this dimension, such as perseverative cognition (worry, rumination), reduced autobiographical memory specificity, compromised fear learning, and enhanced somatic-symptom reporting. In this article, we present a theoretical perspective within a predictive-processing framework in which we trace these phenotypically different characteristics back to a common underlying "better-safe-than-sorry" processing strategy. This implies information processing that tends to be low in sensory-perceptual detail, which allows threat-related categorical priors to dominate conscious experience and for chronic uncertainty/surprise because of a stagnated error-reduction process. This common information-processing strategy has beneficial effects in the short term but important costs in the long term. From this perspective, we suggest that the phenomenally distinct cognitive and affective psychopathological characteristics mentioned above represent the same basic processing heuristic of the brain and are only different in relation to the particular type of information involved (e.g., in working memory, in autobiographical memory, in the external and internal world). Clinical implications of this view are discussed.

摘要

诸如神经质、负性情绪和特质性消极等几个标签,表明了精神病理学的一个广泛维度。然而,已经形成了很大程度上相互独立、通常针对特定障碍的研究路线,这些路线聚焦于与该维度相关的不同认知和情感特征,比如持续认知(担忧、沉思)、自传体记忆特异性降低、恐惧学习受损以及躯体症状报告增加。在本文中,我们在预测加工框架内提出一种理论观点,在该框架中,我们将这些表型上不同的特征追溯到一种共同的潜在“宁可稳妥免致后悔”加工策略。这意味着信息加工在感觉 - 知觉细节方面往往较低,这使得与威胁相关的类别先验能够主导意识体验,并由于错误减少过程停滞而导致长期的不确定性/意外。这种共同的信息加工策略在短期内有有益影响,但从长期来看有重要代价。从这个角度来看,我们认为上述在现象上不同的认知和情感精神病理特征代表了大脑相同的基本加工启发式,并且仅在涉及的特定信息类型方面有所不同(例如,在工作记忆、自传体记忆、外部和内部世界中)。我们讨论了这一观点的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Better Safe Than Sorry: A Common Signature of General Vulnerability for Psychopathology.宁可事先谨慎有余,莫要事后追悔莫及:精神病理学普遍易感性的一个共同特征。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):225-246. doi: 10.1177/1745691620950690. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
Are rumination and neuroticism genetically or environmentally distinct risk factors for psychopathology?反刍和神经质是精神病理学的遗传或环境风险因素吗?
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Jul;128(5):385-396. doi: 10.1037/abn0000430. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
3
Rumination relates to reduced autobiographical memory specificity in formerly depressed patients following a self-discrepancy challenge: the case of autobiographical memory specificity reactivity.反刍与曾患有抑郁症患者在自我差异挑战后的自传体记忆特异性降低有关:自传体记忆特异性反应的案例。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;43(4):1002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
4
Do Overgeneral Autobiographical Memories Predict Increased Psychopathological Symptoms in Community Youth? A 3-Year Longitudinal Investigation.过度泛化自传体记忆是否预示着社区青年心理病理症状的增加?一项为期 3 年的纵向研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;46(2):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0278-5.
5
Personality vulnerabilities to psychopathology: relations between trait structure and affective-cognitive processes.人格病理学脆弱性:特质结构与情感认知过程的关系。
J Pers. 2011 Jun;79(3):527-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00683.x.
6
Autobiographical memory coherence and specificity: Examining their reciprocal relation and their associations with internalizing symptoms and rumination.自传体记忆连贯性和特异性:考察它们的相互关系及其与内化症状和反刍的关系。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 May;116:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
The predictive specificity of psychological vulnerability markers for the course of affective disorders.心理脆弱性标志物对情感障碍病程的预测特异性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Aug;103:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Neuroticism and Somatic Complaints: Concomitant Effects of Rumination and Worry.神经质与躯体不适:沉思和担忧的协同效应
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Jul;47(4):431-445. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000619. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Meta-analysis of the association between rumination and reduced autobiographical memory specificity.关于沉思与自传体记忆特异性降低之间关联的荟萃分析。
Memory. 2018 Nov;26(10):1323-1334. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1474928. Epub 2018 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
State-dependent reactivity of anterior cingulate cortex neurochemistry and downstream autonomic arousal in intrusive thinking.侵入性思维中前扣带回皮质神经化学和下游自主神经唤醒的状态依赖性反应性。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00702-025-02992-2.
2
Increased breathlessness in post-COVID syndrome despite normal breathing patterns in a rebreathing challenge.在重复呼吸激发试验中呼吸模式正常的情况下,新冠后综合征患者呼吸急促症状仍加重。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11728-x.
3
Do expectations shape interoceptive perceptions across body domains? A sham EMF study to test the predictive processing theory.
期望会塑造跨身体区域的内感受知觉吗?一项用于检验预测加工理论的假电磁研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100609. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
4
Affective schemas: Acquisition, updating, and inference.情感图式:习得、更新与推理。
Emotion. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1037/emo0001561.
5
Cognitive inflexibility, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and traits and poor post-pandemic adjustment.认知灵活性不足、强迫症状与特质以及疫情后适应不良。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 May 23;3:104073. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104073. eCollection 2024.
6
Cardiac Interoceptive Accuracy: An Empirical Comparison of Three Ability Measures.心脏内感受准确性:三种能力测量方法的实证比较
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jun;62(6):e70078. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70078.
7
Predicting Emotional Distress, Based on Acquisition, Extinction, Avoidance, and Generalization Learning.基于获得、消退、回避和泛化学习预测情绪困扰
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Oct 23;2024:6366269. doi: 10.1155/2024/6366269. eCollection 2024.
8
Developing a Measure for the Accuracy of Symptom Perception: The Congruence Between Self-reported Dyspnea and Physiological Parameters in the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study.开发一种症状感知准确性的测量方法:荷兰生命线队列研究中自我报告的呼吸困难与生理参数之间的一致性
Biopsychosoc Sci Med. 2025 May 1;87(4):249-258. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001382. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
9
Animal affect, welfare and the Bayesian brain.动物情感、福利与贝叶斯大脑。
Anim Welf. 2024 Oct 8;33:e39. doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.44. eCollection 2024.
10
A network analysis of affective and motivational individual differences and error monitoring in a non-clinical sample.非临床样本中情感和动机个体差异与错误监测的网络分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Oct 3;34(10). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae397.