From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Ann Saudi Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;40(5):408-416. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.408. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Facial nerve weakness is the most common and most concerning complication after parotidectomy. Risk factors for this complication following surgery for benign diseases remain controversial.
Review the frequency and prognosis of facial nerve weakness after parotidectomy and analyze potential risk factors.
Retrospective review of medical records.
Two tertiary care centers.
We included all parotidectomies performed for benign diseases from January 2006 to December 2018. Details about the development and recovery of postoperative facial weakness were recorded. Patient, disease and surgery-related variables were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors.
Frequency, recovery rates and risk factors for facial nerve weakness SAMPLE SIZE: 191 parotidectomies, 183 patients, 61 patients with facial weakness.
The frequency of postoperative facial weakness was 31.9% (61/191 parotidectomies). Among patients with temporary weakness, 90% regained normal facial movement within 6 months. Steroid therapy was not associated with a faster recovery. Postoperative weakness was not associated with age, diabetes, smoking, disease location, use of an intraoperative facial nerve monitor or direction of facial nerve dissection. Risk factors for temporary weakness were total parotidectomy and surgical specimens larger than 60 cubic centimeters. Revision surgery was the only identified risk factor for permanent weakness.
Larger parotid resections increase the risk of temporary facial nerve weakness while permanent weakness is mainly influenced by previous surgeries.
Retrospective nature, underpowered sample size, selection bias associated with tertiary care cases.
None.
面神经无力是腮腺切除术后最常见和最令人担忧的并发症。良性疾病手术后发生这种并发症的危险因素仍存在争议。
回顾腮腺切除术后面神经无力的发生频率和预后,并分析潜在的危险因素。
病历回顾性分析。
两家三级保健中心。
我们纳入了 2006 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因良性疾病行腮腺切除术的所有患者。记录术后面神经无力的发展和恢复情况。使用双变量和多变量分析患者、疾病和手术相关变量,以确定危险因素。
面神经无力的发生率、恢复率和危险因素。
191 例腮腺切除术,183 例患者,61 例面神经无力。
术后面神经无力的发生率为 31.9%(61/191 例腮腺切除术)。暂时性无力患者中,90%在 6 个月内恢复正常面部运动。皮质类固醇治疗与更快的恢复无关。术后无力与年龄、糖尿病、吸烟、疾病部位、术中面神经监测的使用或面神经解剖方向无关。暂时性无力的危险因素是腮腺全切除术和手术标本大于 60 立方厘米。再次手术是永久性无力的唯一确定危险因素。
更大的腮腺切除术增加了暂时性面神经无力的风险,而永久性无力主要受先前手术的影响。
回顾性研究,样本量小,三级保健病例选择偏倚。
无。