Lin Zhi-Qin, Luo Zeng-Rong, Li Qian-Zhen, Chen Liang-Wan, Lin Feng
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Xinquan Road 29#, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, People's Republic of China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Oct 2;15(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01322-9.
Concomitant bipolar radiofrequency ablation and valve replacement in the elderly remains controversial. In the current study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of concomitant valve replacement and bipolar radiofrequency ablation with valve replacement alone in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
This was a retrospective study of patients aged ≥70 years who underwent valve replacement with or without bipolar radiofrequency ablation in a single-centre between January 2006 and March 2015. The early postoperative results and long-term clinical outcomes were compared after propensity score matching.
A total of 34 pairs of patients (73.94 ± 2.64 years old; 34 in the AF with ablation group and 34 in the AF without ablation group) were enrolled in the propensity score matching analysis. There were no significant differences between the two matched groups in terms of surgical mortality (5.88% vs. 2.94%, P = 0.555) and major postoperative morbidity. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly better overall survival in the AF with ablation group compared to the AF without ablation group (P = 0.009). Cumulative incidence curves showed a lower incidence of cardiovascular death in the AF with ablation group (P = 0.025, Gray's test). Patients in the AF with ablation group had a reduced incidence of stroke compared to patients in the AF with ablation group (P = 0.009, Gray's test). The freedom from AF after 5 years was 58.0% in the AF with ablation group and 3.0% in the AF without ablation group.
The addition of bipolar radiofrequency ablation is a safe and feasible procedure, even in patients aged ≥70 years, with a better long-term survival and a reduced incidence of stroke compared to valve replacement alone. These findings suggest that bipolar radiofrequency ablation should always be considered as a concomitant procedure for elderly patients with AF who require cardiac surgery. However, a large-scale, prospective, multi-centre, randomized study should be performed in the future to fully validate our findings.
老年患者同期进行双极射频消融与瓣膜置换仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们旨在比较老年心房颤动(AF)患者同期瓣膜置换与双极射频消融联合单纯瓣膜置换的效果。
这是一项对2006年1月至2015年3月在单中心接受有或无双极射频消融瓣膜置换术的≥70岁患者的回顾性研究。在倾向评分匹配后比较术后早期结果和长期临床结局。
共有34对患者(年龄73.94±2.64岁;消融组房颤患者34例,非消融组房颤患者34例)纳入倾向评分匹配分析。两组在手术死亡率(5.88%对2.94%,P = 0.555)和术后主要并发症方面无显著差异。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,消融组房颤患者的总生存率明显高于非消融组(P = 0.009)。累积发病率曲线显示,消融组房颤患者心血管死亡发生率较低(P = 0.025,Gray检验)。与非消融组房颤患者相比,消融组房颤患者中风发生率降低(P = 0.009,Gray检验)。消融组房颤患者5年后无房颤生存率为58.0%,非消融组为3.0%。
即使在≥70岁的患者中,增加双极射频消融也是一种安全可行的手术,与单纯瓣膜置换相比,具有更好的长期生存率和更低的中风发生率。这些发现表明,对于需要心脏手术的老年房颤患者,双极射频消融应始终被视为同期手术。然而,未来应进行大规模、前瞻性、多中心、随机研究以充分验证我们的发现。