• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从疾病分类第 9 版到第 10 版的脓毒症流行病学差异:鸿沟——应用健康计量和评估研究所病例定义直接分析医院出院数据。

Sepsis Epidemiology Across the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Chasm-A Direct Application of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Case Definition to Hospital Discharge Data.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1881-1884. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004577.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004577
PMID:33009097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11904614/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Describe the epidemiology of sepsis across the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, coding systems, evaluating estimates of two previously published International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, coding strategies.

DESIGN

Serial cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Healthcare Utilization Project's annual Nationwide Inpatient Sample of U.S. hospital discharges, 2012-2017.

PATIENTS

Discharges greater than or equal to 18 years old, which met one of the three case definitions for sepsis. For the records using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, we used previously published modified Angus criteria, and for records using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, we deployed a case definition used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and a case definition developed by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, there were discontinuities in the sepsis incidence estimates using the modified Angus International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, criteria in 2014 and either Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, criteria in 2016. In 2014, there were an estimated 1,009 cases (95% CI, 989-1,030) of modified Angus sepsis per 100,000 persons, whereas in 2016, there were 709 cases (95% CI, 694-724) of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services sepsis and 1,498 cases (95% CI, 1,471-1,092) of Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation sepsis per 100,000 persons. Furthermore, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation definition identified a sepsis cohort with similar hospital characteristics but a younger age distribution, higher proportion of women, lower severity of illness, and lower hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, coding strategy for identifying sepsis may capture a larger patient population within administrative datasets that are different from those identified with previously deployed International Classification of Diseases-based methods. Further work is required to determine the optimal International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, coding strategy for use in hospital discharge data.

摘要

目的

描述从国际疾病分类第 9 版到第 10 版编码系统过渡期间败血症的流行病学,评估两种先前发表的国际疾病分类第 10 版编码策略的估计值。

设计

连续横断面分析。

设置

医疗保健利用项目的美国医院出院年度全国住院患者样本,2012-2017 年。

患者

年龄大于或等于 18 岁,符合败血症的三个病例定义之一。对于使用国际疾病分类第 9 版的记录,我们使用了先前发表的修改后的安格斯标准,对于使用国际疾病分类第 10 版的记录,我们使用了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的病例定义和卫生计量与评估研究所制定的病例定义。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在研究期间,使用修改后的安格斯国际疾病分类第 9 版标准的败血症发病率估计值在 2014 年和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心或卫生计量与评估研究所国际疾病分类第 10 版标准在 2016 年存在不连续。2014 年,每 100,000 人中估计有 1,009 例(95%CI,989-1,030)修改后的安格斯败血症病例,而 2016 年,每 100,000 人中分别有 709 例(95%CI,694-724)医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心败血症病例和 1,498 例(95%CI,1,471-1,092)卫生计量与评估研究所败血症病例。此外,卫生计量与评估研究所的定义确定了一个具有类似医院特征但年龄分布更年轻、女性比例更高、疾病严重程度更低和医院死亡率更低的败血症队列。

结论

卫生计量与评估研究所国际疾病分类第 10 版编码策略用于识别败血症可能会在行政数据集内捕获更大的患者人群,这些患者人群与先前部署的基于国际疾病分类的方法不同。需要进一步努力确定用于医院出院数据的最佳国际疾病分类第 10 版编码策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/11904614/5f4ec0ec8339/nihms-2059683-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/11904614/dd32cb732d9a/nihms-2059683-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/11904614/5f4ec0ec8339/nihms-2059683-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/11904614/dd32cb732d9a/nihms-2059683-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/11904614/5f4ec0ec8339/nihms-2059683-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sepsis Epidemiology Across the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Chasm-A Direct Application of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Case Definition to Hospital Discharge Data.从疾病分类第 9 版到第 10 版的脓毒症流行病学差异:鸿沟——应用健康计量和评估研究所病例定义直接分析医院出院数据。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1881-1884. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004577.
2
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2. The Trajectories of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的脓毒症:2. 2012-2018 年脓毒症的轨迹。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):289-301. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004226.
3
Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.美国严重脓毒症发病率和死亡率的基准研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8.
4
Pediatric severe sepsis in U.S. children's hospitals.美国儿童医院中的儿童严重脓毒症
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):798-805. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000225.
5
Impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity among delivery hospitalizations in the United States.从国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)转换到国际疾病分类第十版临床修订本(ICD - 10 - CM)对美国分娩住院期间严重孕产妇发病率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):422.e1-422.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Gaming hospital-level pneumonia 30-day mortality and readmission measures by legitimate changes to diagnostic coding.通过合理改变诊断编码来衡量医院获得性肺炎的30天死亡率和再入院情况。
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):989-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000862.
7
Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality.分娩相关脓毒症:患病率和死亡率趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):391.e1-391.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
8
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 4. Precoronavirus Disease 2019 Update January 2012-February 2020.医疗保险受益人群中的脓毒症:4. 2019 年冠状病毒病前更新,2012 年 1 月-2020 年 2 月。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2058-2069. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005332.
9
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.美国严重脓毒症的流行病学:发病率、转归及相关护理费用分析
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002.
10
Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.20 年来严重脓毒症患者死亡率趋势:一项比较性荟萃分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Medicare's Sepsis Reporting Policy (SEP-1) and the Documentation of a Sepsis Diagnosis in the Clinical Record.医疗保险败血症报告政策(SEP-1)与临床记录中败血症诊断文档之间的关联。
Med Care. 2024 Jun 1;62(6):388-395. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001997. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Updated estimates of sepsis hospitalizations at United States academic medical centers.美国学术医疗中心脓毒症住院情况的最新估计。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 16;3(4):e12782. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12782. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Patient and economic impact of implementing a paediatric sepsis pathway in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的败血症:1. 2012-2018 年败血症负担。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):276-288. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224.
2
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
3
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州的急诊科实施儿科脓毒症路径对患者和经济的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14226-6.
4
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes After the Introduction of the Medicare Sepsis Performance Measure (SEP-1).在引入医疗保险脓毒症表现测量(SEP-1)后,治疗模式和临床结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):927-935. doi: 10.7326/M20-5043. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
4
The Changing Epidemiology and Definitions of Sepsis.脓毒症不断变化的流行病学及定义
Clin Chest Med. 2016 Jun;37(2):165-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis.利用行政索赔识别严重脓毒症患者: Angus 实施的国际严重脓毒症共识会议定义的患者层面验证。
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86.
6
From the Centers for Disease Control. Increase in National Hospital Discharge Survey rates for septicemia--United States, 1979-1987.来自疾病控制中心。1979 - 1987年美国全国医院出院调查中败血症发病率的上升。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 16;263(7):937-8.