Suppr超能文献

精英短跑的肌肉形态。

The Muscle Morphology of Elite Sprint Running.

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM.

School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Devon, UNITED KINGDOM.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Apr 1;53(4):804-815. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002522.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the differences in muscle volumes and strength between male elite sprinters, sub-elite sprinters, and untrained controls and to assess the relationships of muscle volumes and strength with sprint performance.

METHODS

Five elite sprinters (100-m season's best equivalent [SBE100], 10.10 ± 0.07 s), 26 sub-elite sprinters (SBE100, 10.80 ± 0.30 s), and 11 untrained control participants underwent 1) 3-T magnetic resonance imaging scans to determine the volume of 23 individual lower limb muscles/compartments and 5 functional muscle groups and 2) isometric strength assessment of lower body muscle groups.

RESULTS

Total lower body muscularity was distinct between the groups (controls < sub-elite +20% < elite +48%). The hip extensors exhibited the largest muscle group differences/relationships (elite, +32% absolute and +15% relative [per kg] volume, vs sub-elite explaining 31%-48% of the variability in SBE100), whereas the plantarflexors showed no differences between sprint groups. Individual muscle differences showed pronounced anatomical specificity (elite vs sub-elite absolute volume range, +57% to -9%). Three hip muscles were consistently larger in elite vs sub-elite (tensor fasciae latae, sartorius, and gluteus maximus; absolute, +45%-57%; relative volume, +25%-37%), and gluteus maximus volume alone explained 34%-44% of the variance in SBE100. The isometric strength of several muscle groups was greater in both sprint groups than controls but similar for the sprint groups and not related to SBE100.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the pronounced inhomogeneity and anatomically specific muscularity required for fast sprinting and provides novel, robust evidence that greater hip extensor and gluteus maximus volumes discriminate between elite and sub-elite sprinters and are strongly associated with sprinting performance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨男性精英短跑运动员、次精英短跑运动员和未经训练的对照组之间的肌肉体积和力量差异,并评估肌肉体积和力量与短跑表现的关系。

方法

5 名精英短跑运动员(100 米赛季最佳成绩 [SBE100],10.10±0.07 秒)、26 名次精英短跑运动员(SBE100,10.80±0.30 秒)和 11 名未经训练的对照组参与者进行了 1)3-T 磁共振成像扫描,以确定 23 个下肢肌肉/隔室的体积和 5 个功能肌肉群;2)下肢肌肉群的等长力量评估。

结果

组间总下肢肌肉量存在明显差异(对照组<次精英+20%<精英+48%)。髋伸肌的肌肉群差异最大(精英组绝对增加 32%,相对增加 15%[每公斤]体积,次精英组解释 SBE100 变异的 31%-48%),而跖屈肌在短跑组之间没有差异。个体肌肉差异表现出明显的解剖特异性(精英与次精英的绝对体积差异范围为+57%至-9%)。3 块髋部肌肉在精英与次精英之间始终较大(阔筋膜张肌、缝匠肌和臀大肌;绝对体积增加 45%-57%,相对体积增加 25%-37%),臀大肌体积单独解释了 SBE100 变异的 34%-44%。两组短跑运动员的几个肌肉群的等长力量都高于对照组,但两组短跑运动员之间相似,与 SBE100 无关。

结论

这些发现表明快速短跑需要明显的不均匀性和解剖特异性肌肉量,并提供了新的、强有力的证据,即更大的髋伸肌和臀大肌体积可以区分精英和次精英短跑运动员,并且与短跑表现密切相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验