• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性重度肾损伤的常规重复成像会导致不必要的干预吗?

Does routine repeat imaging for blunt high-grade renal trauma lead to unnecessary interventions?

作者信息

Loftus Christopher J, Hagedorn Judith C, Johnsen Niels V

机构信息

From the Department of Urology (C.J.L., J.C.H.), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and Department of Urology (N.V.J.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jan 1;90(1):143-147. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002966.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002966
PMID:33009338
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most high-grade renal injuries with urinary extravasation (UE) may be managed conservatively without intervention. For such patients, the American Urological Association Urotrauma guidelines recommend repeat imaging within 48 to 72 hours of injury. We sought to examine whether routine, proactive follow-up renal imaging was associated with need for urologic intervention or risk of complications.

METHODS

Patients treated to an urban level 1 trauma center for a five-state region, between 2005 and 2017 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes from a prospectively collected institutional trauma registry. Individual patient charts and imaging were reviewed to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV renal injuries. Those with UE were included, and patients with penetrating trauma, immediate urologic surgery, or in-hospital mortality were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 342 patients with grade IV injuries, 108 (32%) met the inclusion criteria. Urologic intervention was performed in 23% (25 of 108 patients) including endoscopic procedure (24 of 108 patients) and nephrectomy (1 of 108 patients). Repeat imaging was performed within 48 to 72 hours after initial imaging in 65% (70 to 108 patients). Patients who underwent routine reimaging had a higher rate of undergoing subsequent urologic procedure (31.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.008). For patients with reimaging who underwent a procedure, 18% (4 of 22 patients) were symptomatic, while all nonroutinely reimaged patients who underwent a procedure were symptomatic (3 of 3 patients). Patients who received routine repeat imaging had a higher mean number of abdominal computed tomography scans during their admission (2.5 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001), while the complication rate was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with grade IV renal lacerations with UE from blunt trauma who received routine repeat imaging were more likely to undergo an operation in the absence of symptoms and received more radiation during their hospital stay. Forgoing repeat imaging was not associated with an increase in urological complications. These data suggest that, in the absence of signs/symptoms, repeat imaging may be avoidable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

摘要

背景

大多数伴有尿外渗(UE)的重度肾损伤可采取保守治疗而无需干预。对于此类患者,美国泌尿外科学会尿创伤指南建议在损伤后48至72小时内进行重复影像学检查。我们试图研究常规的、积极的随访肾脏影像学检查是否与需要泌尿外科干预或并发症风险相关。

方法

通过前瞻性收集的机构创伤登记处的国际疾病分类第九版和第十版编码,确定2005年至2017年期间在一个五州地区的城市一级创伤中心接受治疗的患者。查阅个体患者病历和影像学资料,以确定所有美国创伤外科学会IV级肾损伤患者。纳入伴有UE的患者,排除穿透性创伤、立即进行泌尿外科手术或住院死亡的患者。

结果

在342例IV级损伤患者中,108例(32%)符合纳入标准。23%(108例患者中的25例)进行了泌尿外科干预,包括内镜手术(108例患者中的24例)和肾切除术(108例患者中的1例)。65%(108例患者中的70例)在初次影像学检查后48至72小时内进行了重复影像学检查。接受常规再次影像学检查的患者接受后续泌尿外科手术的比例更高(31.4%对7.1%,p = 0.008)。对于接受手术的再次影像学检查患者,18%(22例患者中的4例)有症状,而所有接受手术的非常规再次影像学检查患者均有症状(3例患者中的3例)。接受常规重复影像学检查的患者住院期间腹部计算机断层扫描的平均次数更多(2.5次对1.7次,p < 0.001),而两组间并发症发生率相似。

结论

钝性创伤导致的伴有UE 的IV级肾裂伤患者接受常规重复影像学检查,更有可能在无症状的情况下接受手术,且住院期间接受更多辐射。放弃重复影像学检查与泌尿外科并发症增加无关。这些数据表明,在没有体征/症状的情况下,重复影像学检查可能是不必要的。

证据水平

治疗/护理管理IV级。

相似文献

1
Does routine repeat imaging for blunt high-grade renal trauma lead to unnecessary interventions?钝性重度肾损伤的常规重复成像会导致不必要的干预吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jan 1;90(1):143-147. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002966.
2
Routine repeat imaging may be avoidable for asymptomatic pediatric patients with renal trauma.对于无症状的肾外伤患儿,常规重复影像学检查可能是不必要的。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Feb;18(1):76.e1-76.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
Adult blunt renal trauma: routine follow-up imaging is excessive.成人钝性肾外伤:常规随访影像学检查过度。
Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 May 10.
4
Routine follow-up imaging of kidney injuries may not be justified.对肾损伤进行常规的随访成像可能没有必要。
J Trauma. 2011 May;70(5):1229-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5bb8e.
5
Should blunt segmental vascular renal injuries be considered an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grade 4 renal injury?是否应将钝性节段性血管性肾损伤视为美国外科创伤协会 4 级肾损伤?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):484-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa2db4.
6
Validity of routine reimaging of blunt renal trauma managed conservatively.保守治疗钝性肾损伤常规再次成像的有效性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015135.
7
Does routine repeat imaging change management in high-grade renal trauma? Results from three level 1 trauma centers.常规重复影像学检查是否改变了高级别肾外伤的治疗管理?来自 3 个 1 级创伤中心的结果。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1455-1459. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2513-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Nonoperative management of blunt renal trauma: is routine early follow-up imaging necessary?钝性肾损伤的非手术治疗:是否需要常规早期随访影像学检查?
BMC Urol. 2008 Sep 3;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-8-11.
9
Missed Opportunities to Decrease Radiation Exposure in Children with Renal Trauma.儿童肾外伤的辐射暴露减少的错失机会。
J Urol. 2018 Feb;199(2):552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
10
Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre.单纯性肾损伤需要重复 CT 成像吗?——大容量泌尿外科创伤中心的经验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jul 7;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00445-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of pediatric renal trauma with urinary extravasation: a retrospective study in a single clinical center.小儿肾外伤伴尿外渗的管理:单中心回顾性研究
Transl Pediatr. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):200-207. doi: 10.21037/tp-2024-492. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Ureteral contrast findings as a potential predictor for invasive intervention in high-grade pediatric renal trauma: A retrospective analysis.输尿管造影结果作为小儿重度肾损伤侵入性干预潜在预测指标的回顾性分析
Int J Urol. 2025 May;32(5):553-559. doi: 10.1111/iju.70006. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre.
单纯性肾损伤需要重复 CT 成像吗?——大容量泌尿外科创伤中心的经验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jul 7;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00445-9.
4
On the black slope: analysis of the course of a blunt renal trauma collective in a winter sports region.在黑色斜坡上:冬季运动地区钝性肾外伤集体的病程分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):2125-2133. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01830-w. Epub 2021 Dec 16.